Quote:
Originally Posted by Vas Deferens
B)I can't think of another game where a complete moron and his play, can have such an outcome on ones own play. IE where Z grade players can beat G grade players through their own bad play,just too cruel when it consistently happens and i dont wish to play so many tables that those sort of players dont affect ones bottom line.I dont actively throw mice, or break things on tilt, i guess that my way of tilting was to just stop playing when i copped too many bad events in a session.
This is probably not the place to get into this, and it's hardly the first time it has come up, but Z-grade players winning despite or sometimes because of their own bad play is precisely makes them so profitable to skilled players. That's a
good thing. Ideally, you'd want those players to win so often that they'll stay in poker for as long as possible. If it happens too rarely, many weaker players will simply stop playing. It's the counterpart to Sport Sullivan's "feed him just enough for him to know he's hungry" line in
Eight Men Out.
One of the unintended consequences of the poker boom was the overall skill level –*particularly online – increasing significantly. I'd love to see the data on it, as I have to imagine the overall win rate (or loss rate, as it was) for beginning players was much better in 2005 than it was in 2015. Thus, new players lose faster and faster, they enter the poker economy less often, yada yada, unsustainable ecosystem.