Quote:
Originally Posted by xXPocketDucksXx
i hope you're not one of those mods who abuses their power, like the police sometimes do in america (or are portrayed to do). but let me know which parts of my post you wish to edit, and i may give you my permission depending on the circumstances. i admit there may be instances in my post where my wording was slightly imprecise
He's got a gun... pew pew.
Your post is both patronising and arrogant. You basically state how us mere mortals aren't privy to the information you have from your friend (that was your first mistake, some of us are and honestly, no one cares if you know anyone there).
Your argument is also rubbish, people should 100% kick up a fuss if they are paying more for a service and receiving a worse experience/service, which any rake creep is. why is this difficult to understand?
The fact that other sites struggle to be competitive is not a ringing endorsement of pokerstars current practices. Stars was built upon reputation, now it basically runs on sheer numbers/popularity rather than it's core service. There are better run sites out there that just don't have the historical reputation like stars (hence don't have the player pools and will almost never get the player pools that will allow them to compete).
Also, absolutely no one gives a **** if you think we "should be grateful you even have the privilege to play on the site in the first place, instead of moaning about every little thing. " No we ****ing shouldn't you arrogant little ****. It should be a right for almost anyone in the liberal world, the fact it is in some places and isn't in others doesn't make us lucky. In fact if you had half a brain you would realise it means that we're all unlucky. So yeah, heed the advice of the other people telling you to pipe down. Please don't bring the same rot to this forum as you did to the micro one.