Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
**** Official 2012 Pokerstars Regs Thread **** **** Official 2012 Pokerstars Regs Thread ****

11-09-2012 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
is today the day FR zoom died?
This is getting even worse in the last couple of weeks. Even 100NL FR start to have periods of downtime.

I wonder what is the next step? Midstakes FR dying completely?
11-09-2012 , 04:16 PM
calling JOnion
11-09-2012 , 04:17 PM
rush poker dead too
11-09-2012 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_2
calling JOnion
the trolling took a noticable dip when you got scammed. did you get paid back or just get over it?

either way good to see you back man
11-09-2012 , 04:29 PM
who got scammed have i missed something?
11-09-2012 , 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
is today the day FR zoom died?
Thank the Lord.
11-09-2012 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurt2
pokerstars concedes that their their queue-to-start system is bad and that we should be able to play shorthanded zoom (would drastically help the games get started in the morning ldo). they say they are working on this problem. but, seeing as how we've been waiting many months already, every additional month that stars does nothing feels like a kick in the teeth for those of us who love FR zoom and hate the brutal waitlists of the regular FR games.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaskedManQc
This is getting even worse in the last couple of weeks. Even 100NL FR start to have periods of downtime.

I wonder what is the next step? Midstakes FR dying completely?
Yeah, 100NL often doesn't run in the mornings now, and obv rebirth of FTP doesn't help with the Stars player pool.

Caleb said they were hoping to introduce short-handed play at FR Zoom months ago (June) as Hurt says (although Caleb did say it would prob take a few months if they did it.) I'll message him again, and see if they still intend to do this.

(EDIT: Message sent to Caleb. I have asked him if he could comment in this thread as to Stars' plans regarding possible Zoom short-handed play.)

Last edited by MeleaB; 11-09-2012 at 04:43 PM.
11-09-2012 , 05:25 PM
this is why i stopped playing fr over a year ago
11-09-2012 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
the trolling took a noticable dip when you got scammed. did you get paid back or just get over it?

either way good to see you back man
got paid in full thanks to the help i got from Meleab and some others who donated their information and time..really happy how that ended
11-09-2012 , 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluegrassplayer
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinivici9586
its absurd that any reasonable "pro" playing SSFR rather than MSFR can hit the 2nd highest vip level in 6 weeks, but to make it to the highest it takes a year of hell
I'm not really convinced that a 500k level would cost Stars money. It would give a significant amount of players the motivation to play a much larger volume thus making stars more money. Also once people get to that level, they then realize that SNE is also obtainable and might be willing to put in even more effort and volume.
+1
also, i think the theory that eliminating the ssers would crush stars as well should be dispelled or analyzed further before making sweeping assumptions. i think eliminating cap games would def crush them as they're cash machines, but with the amount of 3b/folds and 4bshoves>folds that aren't raked in normal games, compared to the amount of hands that could take a flop deeper, which would be raked, it seems like just a theory to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MeleaB
When the green arrow, to the left of the options box, turns yellow you know that you have timid out on a table (or have checked "sit out next BB) so just click it --> resume.

Now that you can have an individual table close once you check "sit out next BB" it much easier to swap tables in/out while stacking.

I'm finding stacking both table types pretty seamless. It's just the small risk of mis-clicking due to the fast-fold option- but it's nothing major.
thanks... i guess when i stacked the zoom tables i felt like i wasn't really taking advantage of the 'fast fold' button because the tables would only pop up when it's my turn (iirc). but i've been trying to avoid zoom in general lately.
11-09-2012 , 06:24 PM
I don't see how adding a Supernova+ level costs them anything. Leave the milestone bonus the same, change the color of my stars and give me a 4x multiplier. And no the 4x multiplier won't cost them anything because I'll almost be doubling my volume to get it.

Steve,

I know you said it's unlikely to happen but do you know off the top of your head if the costs would be high for something like this? It seems like any costs would easily be offset by increased rake. Thanks.
11-09-2012 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_2
got paid in full thanks to the help i got from Meleab and some others who donated their information and time..really happy how that ended
good to hear and props to melea
11-09-2012 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
I don't see how adding a Supernova+ level costs them anything. Leave the milestone bonus the same, change the color of my stars and give me a 4x multiplier. And no the 4x multiplier won't cost them anything because I'll almost be doubling my volume to get it.

Steve,

I know you said it's unlikely to happen but do you know off the top of your head if the costs would be high for something like this? It seems like any costs would easily be offset by increased rake. Thanks.
the cost to pokerstars would be insignifigant, if anything. up to this point it seems like they have zero concerns with the impact of game quality when it comes to increasing players volume so i'm not sure if what their hesitation is other than it may cost them slightly more in payouts to people who would achieve this milestone anyways vs the additional rake generated by people increasing volume
11-09-2012 , 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
the cost to pokerstars would be insignifigant, if anything. up to this point it seems like they have zero concerns with the impact of game quality when it comes to increasing players volume so i'm not sure if what their hesitation is other than it may cost them slightly more in payouts to people who would achieve this milestone anyways vs the additional rake generated by people increasing volume
all poker sites have started to focus less on high volume regs that are crushing the games in the last months. Ipoker started to ban from their site some of biggest winners (without them doing anything wrong) and party poker closed all stakes >1000NL.

Stars has a total monopoly over the market. If you don't agree with what they do you can't really do anything about it. This is probably why stars does not consider rewarding more 400-500k vpp regs.
11-09-2012 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
give me a 4x multiplier
11-09-2012 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by danuuutz
Ipoker started to ban from their site some of biggest winners (without them doing anything wrong)
WTF ?

Is it because the skins had a desequilibrate ratio winners / fishes ? Or just because they had a big BB/100 ?
11-09-2012 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13_Xerxes
WTF ?

Is it because the skins had a desequilibrate ratio winners / fishes ? Or just because they had a big BB/100 ?
I guess because of this: desequilibrate ratio winners(crushers) / fishes
11-09-2012 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
I don't see how adding a Supernova+ level costs them anything. Leave the milestone bonus the same, change the color of my stars and give me a 4x multiplier. And no the 4x multiplier won't cost them anything because I'll almost be doubling my volume to get it.

Steve,

I know you said it's unlikely to happen but do you know off the top of your head if the costs would be high for something like this? It seems like any costs would easily be offset by increased rake. Thanks.
Are you stupid or just naive?
11-09-2012 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinivici9586
its absurd that any reasonable "pro" playing SSFR rather than MSFR can hit the 2nd highest vip level in 6 weeks, but to make it to the highest it takes a year of hell
that's teh only thing party poker did better imo when they introduced their palladium reward program (don't know if it is still there).

they had like a rolling 3month period where u could make palladium elite and then maintain it thereafter for a while.
i wouldn't mind giving stars 3 or even 6 month elite volume in winter but teh whole year for 0.35-0.40VPP/hand no effin way. i did sne in 2009 and 2010, 800k last year, 600k tis year and i doubt i'll be doing moar than 500k next year tbh...
atm i have so much time (september-december) but for me there is absolutely no reason to increase my volume in any way. milestones are nice but by far not progressive enough that i would wanted to push for 700 or 800k, both which i could've moar or less easily done...

Quote:
Originally Posted by K_2
What about a 2yr/3yr/5yr continued loyalty bonus?
they give u kind of expensive watch once u hit 5mio vpp
11-09-2012 , 09:01 PM
lets get back to reg gossip. anyone read 40bber "neugaray" as "you-are-gay". i mean meleab for sure, but who else?
11-09-2012 , 10:55 PM
k i've asked a few people about this on skype, just to settle an argument, is this song **** or not?

11-09-2012 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayox
Are you stupid or just naive?
Enlighten me please condescending internet know it all.
11-10-2012 , 04:28 AM
11-10-2012 , 05:02 AM
hahaha best popcorn gif i have seen to date!
11-10-2012 , 06:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurt2
pokerstars concedes that their their queue-to-start system is bad and that we should be able to play shorthanded zoom (would drastically help the games get started in the morning ldo). they say they are working on this problem. but, seeing as how we've been waiting many months already, every additional month that stars does nothing feels like a kick in the teeth for those of us who love FR zoom and hate the brutal waitlists of the regular FR games.
You don't have much longer to wait for shorthanded Zoom.

Quote:
Originally Posted by K_2
What about a 2yr/3yr/5yr continued loyalty bonus?
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
I know you said it's unlikely to happen but do you know off the top of your head if the costs would be high for something like this? It seems like any costs would easily be offset by increased rake. Thanks.
I don't expect that there will be any increases in rewards for high volume players in the forseeable future. We do have a 5m LTVPP award (a watch) and will announce a 10m LTVPP award at some point.

We are happy with the amount of rewards offered at these levels.

      
m