Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Small Stakes Full Ring

Notices

Small Stakes Full Ring Discussion of .50/1 and 1/2 online and 5/10 live no-limit and pot-limit Texas hold'em full ring games, situations and strategies

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2012, 11:37 AM   #31
grinder
 
justDgmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 1 room appt.
Posts: 461
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

$80 obv
justDgmt is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 11:48 AM   #32
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 272
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty View Post
I'm confused with what you're asking.
Lets assume that you pay $100 rake in 1000 hands. If PS decreases the rake by 20% (5->4%), youre not gonna pay $80 rake in 1000 hands. It mostly depends on your limit, but youre gonna pay ~$85-90.

Nevertheless your statment still true. In some cases you can lose money when PS lower the rake.
havenofear is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 11:55 AM   #33
grinder
 
justDgmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 1 room appt.
Posts: 461
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

deppends on rb %, weird
justDgmt is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 11:58 AM   #34
grinder
 
justDgmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 1 room appt.
Posts: 461
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

justDgmt is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:05 PM   #35
veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,573
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty View Post
Would you rather pay $100 for a Swedish penis pump and be given $80 back, or would you rather pay $80 for it and be given $51.20 back?
Is it really that simple? Does the lower rake not add to your winrate therefore you are earning less rakeback but earning more profits from poker?

Has anyone gone thru a large database and seen what % of pots fall under the $66.70 threshold vs pots that are over and calculated the extra bb/100 from the lower rake vs the loss of rakeback?

This probably would apply more to 200 and under as 400+ would hit that threshold really quickly
NL__Fool is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:07 PM   #36
Pooh-Bah
 
ROM Amnesty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In bed with Maureen.
Posts: 3,665
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by havenofear View Post
Lets assume that you pay $100 rake in 1000 hands. If PS decreases the rake by 20% (5->4%), youre not gonna pay $80 rake in 1000 hands. It mostly depends on your limit, but youre gonna pay ~$85-90.

Nevertheless your statment still true. In some cases you can lose money when PS lower the rake.
You're right.

The rake cap would have to be reduced proportional too, for those numbers to be precise, but the point still holds.
ROM Amnesty is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:19 PM   #37
grinder
 
justDgmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 1 room appt.
Posts: 461
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

smb i m disappoint
justDgmt is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:23 PM   #38
Pooh-Bah
 
Glanza_Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Throwing money around
Posts: 4,005
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Ow man, 3rd page Gl this year everyone
Glanza_Mike is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:29 PM   #39
old hand
 
NatisFinest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,707
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty View Post
Would you rather pay $100 for a Swedish penis pump and be given $80 back, or would you rather pay $80 for it and be given $51.20 back?
I'd rather buy a used one on here for 30 bucks, they take returns too if it doesn't work...

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from...All-Categories
NatisFinest is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:30 PM   #40
journeyman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 366
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Sitting out. Hurricane was at the tables telling everyone he likes the new changes. I asked him if he knew that all regs lose regardless of style. He replied "ya i dont mind a hit, at least this is more fair"
lydia12345 is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:31 PM   #41
veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,573
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glanza_Mike View Post
Ow man, 3rd page Gl this year everyone
Page 1, your doing it wrong..
NL__Fool is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:31 PM   #42
adept
 
krolewicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 976
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugant View Post
at what time does mass sit out end?
apart from some 3/6 i fail to see mass sitout ?
krolewicz is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:33 PM   #43
grinder
 
justDgmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 1 room appt.
Posts: 461
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

justDgmt is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:34 PM   #44
Pooh-Bah
 
Slugant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Holland
Posts: 3,875
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

is it me or is everyone playing right now instead of sitting out?
Slugant is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:35 PM   #45
journeyman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 366
Re: **** Official Pokerstars Regs Thread 2012 ****

I'm disappointed to see some regs are still playing. not to call out any names. uh HUM JOEINGRAM1
lydia12345 is offline  

Closed Thread
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive