Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
**** Official 2012 Pokerstars Regs Thread **** **** Official 2012 Pokerstars Regs Thread ****

01-03-2012 , 12:34 AM
uh oh
01-03-2012 , 12:41 AM
i found that link saved in my bookmarks and never remember doing it lol, doesn't apply YET
01-03-2012 , 01:16 AM
I know who berezixl is, me and him are skyper buddies
01-03-2012 , 01:24 AM
Dear lydia12345,

We’re writing to inform you that the number of ring game tables you are able to sit at concurrently (your ‘table cap’) has been increased to 24.

Thank you for choosing PokerStars, the world’s largest poker room.



OH man, time to be a slave for them again for this year.
01-03-2012 , 06:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bereziNLX3
i guess this is kinda worth posting here for kicks. a few weeks ago i ran up a stack to ~2500bbs. i would've hit 2800+ but i lost a flip and ran into some standard coolers. the next day i ran two tables up to 1500 also hah. i guess this is my only 'poker brag'.



brb im currently going insane.
very good colour coding system!
01-03-2012 , 08:03 AM
Is today still a holiday in some places? Tables at 100nl have been awesome for a Tuesday morning.
01-03-2012 , 08:42 AM
did PS already release screenshots of the fast moving ringgame thing?

ron: still school holidays here in germany until the end of this week. many parents take some free days.
01-03-2012 , 09:32 AM
01-03-2012 , 09:45 AM
11k hands @ 200 = 0.39vpp/hand, FML. Probably should try playing like natis 18/12 wtsd 35
01-03-2012 , 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugant
What a moron rotfl
01-03-2012 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ment52
gotta set the hud for every different table type at hud ->site options.
I did set default 2.0 to boss network and it still goes back to default 2.0 on a different site, where i set my actual hud for the site i wanted.
01-03-2012 , 01:17 PM
Is HM2 worth upgrading? I'm still using HM1.
01-03-2012 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by e306
Is HM2 worth upgrading? I'm still using HM1.
Judging by the gross graphs, no.
01-03-2012 , 01:22 PM
Just played a very nitty (12.5/10/3.5) 700-hand session to see how things compared. 0.16 VPP/100 (2012) versus 0.27 VPP/100 (2011)

A decrease of 39%.
01-03-2012 , 01:23 PM
jesus.
01-03-2012 , 01:26 PM
....and people didn't believe I lost 31% when FTP switched over last year......
01-03-2012 , 01:29 PM
holy ****. .16 vpps
01-03-2012 , 01:35 PM
200 back to graveyard :[
01-03-2012 , 01:36 PM
What did people average at 100NL a couple of years ago, prior to the last changes?
01-03-2012 , 01:36 PM
one thing this goes to show, other than stars are money grabbing cvnts, etc etc is just how good the nits have had it all this time

Quote:
What did people average at 100NL a couple of years ago, prior to the last changes?
bout .350?
01-03-2012 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty
Just played a very nitty (12.5/10/3.5) 700-hand session to see how things compared. 0.16 VPP/100 (2012) versus 0.27 VPP/100 (2011)

A decrease of 39%.
waaaay too small sample size. over 2k hands at 100NL I have .31vpp/hand so far in HEM and .30 in stars
sustainable?
01-03-2012 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugant
im intriged by opening 5bb in early position
ive seen klairic & wobbly do it regularly these days , is this a new thingy?
Just trying something new... Going to try some other things too. I was doing some 6x as well.
01-03-2012 , 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jah Onion
waaaay too small sample size. over 2k hands at 100NL I have .31vpp/hand so far in HEM and .30 in stars
sustainable?
Obviously it's a small sample, but it's significant enough to give some sort of indication, otherwise there's no point in posting this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jah Onion
one thing this goes to show, other than stars are money grabbing cvnts, etc etc is just how good the nits have had it all this time
01-03-2012 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROM Amnesty
Just played a very nitty (12.5/10/3.5) 700-hand session to see how things compared. 0.16 VPP/100 (2012) versus 0.27 VPP/100 (2011)

A decrease of 39%.
Followed up immediately with a loose (25/22/3.5) 600-hand session and got 0.32 (2012) versus the same 0.27 (2011)

An increase of 18%

-------------------------------------------

The trouble is playing 25/22 is much harder to play profitably for mammoth sessions of course.

Last edited by ROM Amnesty; 01-03-2012 at 02:18 PM.
01-03-2012 , 02:27 PM
I'm still getting .35 this year at 100NL!

On another note, anyone having trouble with hot keys using table ninja when the table size is anything but default? Tilting the **** out of me

      
m