Hi,

Villain is 22.4 over 2k hands

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
SB ($100)
Hero ($100)
UTG ($101)
UTG+1 ($171)
UTG+2 ($112)
CO ($45.10)
BTN ($46.50)

Dealt to Hero A A

fold, fold, fold, CO calls $1, BTN calls $1, fold, Hero raises to $6, fold, BTN calls $5

FLOP ($13.50) 4 7 4

Hero bets $7.50, BTN calls $7.50

TURN ($28.50) 4 7 4 Q

Hero ?

What would you do here please ?

2nd bet seems right

$21.49

yeah like 20 and call is good

Villain is 22/4.


Thanks for your advices.


What hands are you expecting him to call here please ?

I often find myself in this spot and don't bet because I think that villain often has a flush and when he doesn't he will fold because he's scared of both the Q and the third club (unless he has like Ac7x).

hes just some fish on a board where hes gonna have rouble folding like 88 with a flush draw or whatever.

What others said and I would also bet flop ~$11-12

why

Cause we are well ahead of his range, and cause a fish calling range is not very elastic

I would bet more on flop, esp with stack size of villain. I would try to commit myself by leaving him with only a pot size stack left and then I get it in on any turn. If he hit, he hit but no need to try to level yourself vs half stackers.

Not sure y'all looking at stacks right. I think Xela is spot on, bigger flop bet sets up turn shove.

i think you should cbet smaller.

Agree with smaller cbet. I prefer getting the stacks in over 3 streets as opposed to 2, but maybe thats just me.

yeah his calling range on the flop is quite elastic, blasting almost pot could easily make him fold some ace highs and overcards that wouldn't be folding to half pot.

Are there actual benefits to this other than saving the amount of clicks? Is there a tangible difference in the outcomes of shoving turn for 3/4 pot or betting 3/4 pot with 1/3 the pot left?