Quote:
|
For instance, if my opponent is super aggro and i have a big hand i'm more likely to check/raise, if he's aggro and i have SDV/thin value then I am more inclined to x/c, if opponent is nit I will bet air and draws, if he's a total POW(station) I will bet my all my value hands and even sometimes hands that would otherwise be SDV only.
|
this is a "system" and doesn't work against thinking players who hand read at a basic level.
also, you seem very hostile against this forum despite the loads of free advice you've been given (even if you have to use your brain to separate the troals from the non).
Quote:
Hand 1: 60/40
Hand 2: 30/70
Hand 3: 40/60
Hand 4: 80/20
|
this right here is a golden nugget of information. a good response from you would have been a bunch of why's and why not's regarding these numbers, exposing your own thought process as detailed as can, and being gracious for any answers given trolling or not, instead of getting pissy about something unrelated.
this is a good template you can use to respond to meleab if you want:
Quote:
|
me (you): regarding the A2hh on K25r (i believe we raised and are facing a cbet in position), i think the high frequency you recommend c-betting is due to the high number of merits for doing so. first - we have lots of good kings and they dont. second, we have backdoor nut draw an unexpected pair and tremendous fold equity.
|
you seem to think you're owed something. you're not. the poker world's very different than it was 2 years ago, just as it was before that and so on. it's tough. you need to sack up if you want to cut it and carry yourself better too if you want respect.
there's a lot of good threads in the archives. and once you get good, or at least more acquainted with the online poker world, which is very different and more awesome than any other world that currently exists, you'll find the humor in many of the posts you find insulting.