Quote:
The reason I mentioned Penick's book is that it teaches you how to learn as much as any golf book, rather than try to provide you with the secret to a perfect technique. I think Rotella's read a little that way too, he provides examples to explain the correct mental approach. I could also highly recommend "The Inner Game of Golf" by Timothy Gallway.
None of those books will mess you up in any way. I don't like Pelz at all from a technique point of view only his stats are remotely interesting.
I agree on Penick. He might be a more fulfilling read first time 'round after some experience with the game.
I have friends who really connected with Rotella and I recall similar, earlier responses to Gallway. While I do indulge myself with the occasional Buddhist retreat, these guys are not my cup of tea. Probably more about the messengers than the message...
I thought Pelz' early, first effort was terrific; so much so that I phoned him for a chat. I love it when sharp guys (and gals) challenge conventional wisdom with a sweaty stack of data. (Look what my homie Bill James hath wrought!) But I can't see Nicklaus making every darn put he had to make, if a Pelz was in his head. I want some room left over for mystery in my golf physics.
Preceding Pelz, we had the extraordinary Homer Kelley and his
Golfing Machine, an engineer on the physics, geometry and bio-mechanics of the golf swing.
Let's get Mr darknight started on that one! He could really explore the dark side of golf with Bobby Clampett and Mac O Grady and Homer, who didn't write his book in order, or bother to cut and paste when he was through, after something like 25 years -- instead, he instructs you how to bounce around among the pages. Homer did come up with the concept of "lag," now a contemporary favorite.
Oh, man... What a game...