Originally Posted by hamdoggg
I'm not referring to how much they show Tiger at all...I was referring specifically to how they put Tiger at the top of the list of wherever he is on the leaderboard...for example on top of all players at -1, etc.
To relate that to showing 100% Tiger Woods coverage and no one else is pretty stupid and non-comparable.
Originally Posted by loK2thabrain
For someone who fancies himself some sort of genius, you really need to work on your reading comprehension.
Yeah, bad reading comprehension there. My bad.
But yes, the graphics should be consistent in how they do so, whoever has played the most holes is on top and so on down the line. And a handful of tournaments do not give special consideration to Tiger I've noticed. I thought the Masters was one of those.