Quote:
Originally Posted by Man ag City
K2D out of interest what do you class as a huge winner at 1-2? Didn't you put on a earlier post the .25/.50 games were pretty much unbeatable?
there is ten times more action at 1-2 then at .25-.50, .25-.50 is always running and every time i sit in a game the action is terrible, or i catch the last round of the fish and then it dies
1-2 only runs if there is a fish, and once the fish leaves the game breaks
its the same between the difference of 1-2 and 2-5 in vegas
the low stakes games are scared money, if you want to play a run over the nits game then by all means play the .25-.50 on 888 or 1-2 in vegas and i am sure you can pick up tiny pot after tiny pot
if you want to bumhunt then you need to play higher, fish generally have lots of money and that is why they dont mind spewing it away
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspill
it's possible you're way over EV lifetime, you play long hours but don't mass-table or get many hands in. would ask how many but no holdem manager
just recall you 1 - 2 table a lot, rarely more. then before when playing mtts it was only a handful a month
above EV as much as lol69 is down imo
did PE teach you a lesson in trolling?
i have actually run extremely bad at 1-2 (how many emails did i send you on the subject) and am still way up in it because of game selection
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITT666
The argument against open limping big PP's from EP is 'don't do it because it turns your hand face up for your opponents.'
In this situation though it should be alright because he has a total drooler that his hand isn't face up to even when he does this, and he actually likes the fact that his hand is face up to the other guy because he wants him to fold so he can have the droolers money all to himself. Also it works out quite nicely considering the droolers stack size.
I think limping AA is fine there, and quite possibly did work out better for him than open 2-betting would have.
Also AQ does not need to be an auto 3-bet everytime, I don't play online anymore but I'd have to guess there are winning mid stakes players that flat AQ more than 3-bet it. If your choices are to be near the bottom of your 3-bet value range or the tippity top of your flatting range thus under repping your hand somewhat in the process which would you prefer? The latter sounds preferable to me.
Most of his mid pocket pair hands I'm on board with not liking.
His AA hand and his AQ flat pre seem fine - good.
its funny how guys on here never watch me play, have no clue about the table dynamics, and then judge my 'terrible plays' when i got basically exactly what i hoped for out of the hand
i played my hand in a way that got someone to call a quarter of their stack pre vs my AA....... good luck finding more profitable spots then that in todays poker climate
the thing about fish is they dont really care how big a bet is, if they like their hand they are going to call, and getting people to call more than 10% of their stack pre when u have big pairs isnt a bad thing
Last edited by kick2dante; 09-29-2015 at 03:31 AM.