|
|
| High Stakes MTT Discussion and analysis of high stakes MTT hands and techniques |
02-06-2012, 11:53 AM
|
#16
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Waterloo obv
Posts: 3,263
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
I kiiinda like it, not the most ideal spot for it (I'd like it better if the turn was a bit more wet obv), but I think like a 60-75% pot bet otr is slightly better w/o any real info. There's def regs this will be good against, or specific info that will likely make it good as NSB, but I think a lot of regs will just kinda fold and move on to the next table vs. this almost always, yet sigh/call a biggish <PSB almost always.
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 11:57 AM
|
#17
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Snow please!
Posts: 3,604
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
Too much otr, other than that nh
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 12:06 PM
|
#18
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Waterloo obv
Posts: 3,263
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by marek_heinz
the reg will not expect you to try and fold out AJ-AK and you should have Tx heaps here
|
Idk, I don't think a reg should expect NSB to expect him to have those hands all that much in the first place, and vs. 2 villains that seem to be giving up I don't think Tx is as believable as XX.
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 12:12 PM
|
#19
|
|
Modding All Day
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Frazier >>>>> Chilly
Posts: 37,195
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
I can't believe people aren't suggesting that NSB has 55 here.
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 12:36 PM
|
#20
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TY IDIOT
Posts: 7,727
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
this bet with 55 is borderline stupid/impossible
also , pls tell me shoved and you stood there puzzled
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 01:11 PM
|
#21
|
|
centurion
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 167
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
With Reads: I like it
Readless: Seems optimistic to go for 2k OTR, although i still don't mind an overbet.
his 2k river bet calling range: AJ, A9/A8ss, AQ??
his 1.35k river bet calling range: AJ, A9, AQ, KK, QQ, JJ?
I think it makes sense to go for 1.35k OTR if readless, seems like they have a wider range to call you with if they do happen to be a stubborn fish.
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 01:44 PM
|
#22
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: They see my trollin', they hatin'
Posts: 3,330
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
But it's Never Scared B, bro, he never has it so he can overshove 33 for value here.
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 04:37 PM
|
#23
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Giving you the Raw Deal
Posts: 10,594
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
I like everything up until the river, which is too big. Feel like a bit over pot does better.
|
|
|
02-06-2012, 05:06 PM
|
#24
|
|
centurion
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 161
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
yer 666 otr
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 01:39 AM
|
#25
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: @UnreaLJamiL
Posts: 2,242
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
yeah not a fan of river bet. looks fine other than that.
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 07:54 AM
|
#26
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,990
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeverScaredB
I call the obvious bluff, you have no friends.
|
Perfect.
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 06:18 PM
|
#27
|
|
adept
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: LV/Ab- I am here from the future
Posts: 733
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
I don't mind the r bet tbh esp since it contradicts what value sizing villain perceives u to make. Adding your image in + river line =s A hero leveling bluff catching call sometimes  !
I prob make it closer to what dunst says as you going to get called more often. However, if you start taking some more lines like this and more regs and villains see bluffs/value, I am sure long term it will pay some dividends. Start to mnd fk everyone
Last edited by sick cards; 02-09-2012 at 06:23 PM.
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 09:31 AM
|
#28
|
|
adept
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: in yo face
Posts: 1,097
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
I'd just go 80% on river, this is too much...sure pl level themselves vs u often enough but this is too big and his range is too weak....think he'll have a PP more often than Ax the way he played it and I doubt he's gonna look u up in this spot..
If u wanna overbet 130% might be kinky, but 2k is too much
|
|
|
02-11-2012, 11:15 AM
|
#29
|
|
adept
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 700
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
this would be better as a bluff, I just don't see how you get called by AJ
|
|
|
02-11-2012, 01:34 PM
|
#30
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: They see my trollin', they hatin'
Posts: 3,330
|
Re: I have a case of the greeds part 2: big 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Terry
Perfect.
|
It's not funny (I didn't laugh) and it's not accurate (I have dozens of friends on Facebook), so I don't see what is so "perfect" about his statement.
Last edited by Pghfan987; 02-11-2012 at 01:39 PM.
Reason: they see me trollin', they hatin', but my BAC is over point thirty (over point thirty, over point thirty, my BAC is ...)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.
|