Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
Well that was what Betgo was saying. You agree with him.
Betgo said that payjumps counteract ICM which is completely false as payjumps are a part of ICM and lead to finding a solution. As you don't seem to be able to comprehend what I'm saying I'll just say that ICM is mostly based on payjumps and therefore it doesn't matter how steep or flat the payjumps are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
Do you agree with Borgata/stealthmunk that raise folding TT was unprofitable with the sb on 14% ? Bear in mind that he was ignoring "skill edges" and possible benefits not included in the prize money when he first posted this.
It's 7:52AM, I am highly intoxicated and yet able to, as opposed to you, form a rational thought without struggle.
How high do you think the chances are that I will open Pokerstove to put in a 14% range of hands, scribble down the ICM calculation and agree or disagree with your statement? Give me a number.
Also since both of you seem to be pretty drawing dead at making money with poker, maybe you can make a video of you guys sucking eachother off?
I bet some sites will pay a few hundred bucks for that, better than nothing!