Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
Setting a goal of losing or reaching a target weight is a bad strategy. To make optimal progress toward that goal, you'll starve yourself and lose fat and muscle. Losing fat is good. Losing muscle isn't. You want to maintain or preferably increase your lean body mass. So if you're improving your fitness and body composition in a healthy way, you might not see much progress on the scale even if your pants and dress sizes are changing.
Telling an overweight person to "recomp" and not set weight goals is silly. No, the target weight isn't the only goal, but all that extra fat is the low hanging fruit and chasing it will give them way faster gains and help with compliance as they can see their plan is working, week by week. A person with 40 excess pounds of fat can lose 2 pounds a week of fat at first, and probably lose all 40 pounds in around 40 weeks on a deficit. On the other hand, if they choose to eat at maintenance and "recomp" they might gain 1-2 pounds of muscle the first five months, and then .5-1 pounds the next five months, and then where are they?
e.g. 5'2" 170 lb 36% bf 62 lbs fat woman
40 weeks later with deficit: 130 lbs 23% bf 30 lbs fat (assuming 20% lbm loss)
40 weeks later at maintenance: 170 lbs 30% bf 50.75 lbs fat
In the case of SGT RJ she might already have significant muscle mass in which case my already optimistic projection of how much muscle can be added could be way over.
The biggest problem with eating at maintenance is it never gets you where you need to be if you're sufficiently overweight. This is because even if you max out muscle to genetic potential, you're still feeding all the fat layered on top.