Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
It might work for you, but doesn't mean something different wouldn't work better
I enjoy it as a progression scheme tbh. And I think my variant fixes some of the complaints since I'm getting in more squatting and lifting 5 days per week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihkel05
Can someone summarize the "way its written", along with the complaints?
Like the people who hate on SS usually are ranting about their own deluded idea of what to do, and pretending its etched in stone without any reasonable changes being possible.
Lifts 4 days per week-
Day 1: OHP + accessories
Day 2: DL + accessories
Day 3: Bench + accessories
Day 4: Squat + accessories
Find 1RM, then use 90% of that for all these calculations.
Week 1: 5x65%, 5x75%, 5+x85%
Week 2: 3x70%, 3x80%, 3+x90%
Week 3: 5x65%, 3x75%, 1+x95%
Week 4: Deload
Move up maxes 5# on OHP & Lady's Press and 10# on DL & Squat each iteration.
The general question they were answering was a common one: "Should I do Texas Method or 5/3/1 after SS linear progression?" Their answers were "TM sucks because too much volume", "5/3/1 sucks because too little volume." and apparently Wendler never even did 5/3/1. There was also a complaint that 5/3/1 bases all lifts off of 90% of your max, because reasons. IIRC, the book basically says that they start at 90% so you can keep making rep progress over time. I read that like 6 years ago, so I'd have to check it out.