My proposed plan has not significantly changed since the last thread I started.
edit/tsearcher -- (Which can be found here). I am going to attempt to eat as much as possible for the next 30 days, hopefully averaging much higher than 4k calories and as much as 6k. I am aiming for greater than 80 percent of the calories I get to come from fat with the remaining to be protein. I will have close to zero carb intake and the only carbs I will be consuming will be from the less than 1 gram that accompanies each egg and the not easily measurable amounts in the glycogen from the meat. No alcohol is allowed either.
About half of these calories will come from cow meat and the rest from eggs, butter, suet and coconut oil, the latter three being 100% fat. In a typical day I will eat 3-4 pounds of meat, 4-6 eggs, 1 stick of butter, ¼-1lb suet, and 2-5 tsp coconut. I might supplement this in the future with heavy cream, which says 0 carbs on the label but in reality might be somewhere <0.5g per serving. Cheeses and other oils might creep in as well, but for now I want to be very strict about any carbs entering my fortress of fat. I will be using the label for the most part to get the nutritional info except for the meat and suet which I will be using the USDA nutrient data laboratory website.
This is an experiment of sorts where I will be testing how the composition of my body changes with respect to this incredibly high calorie and fat diet. Although its far away from hard science, this overdose of nutrition for this time period alone should be enough for some interesting results. Throughout this time period, which may change depending on my results, I will remain mostly sedentary and not do any excessive exercise. I will be lifting heavy weights for 30-45 min every third but will keep strict notes I do happen to do something like play dodge ball for 3 hours.
According to conventional wisdom, the amount of calories I consume must have a direct effect on my weight. My change in body composition should be equal to the calories I consume minus the calories my body burns. Calories consumed is going to be very easy to get an accurate answer but the calories I am burning is going to be fairly subjective. My basal metabolic rate for daily calorie usage found online is around 2000. I’ll look into getting a better number for this later but for now I will settle on something between 2500-3k calories for the calories out part of the equation.
If this simple equation holds true then I must gain some weight. For instance, if I consume an extra 150g of fat each day for 30 days I will theoretically put on 10 pounds. Part of my experiment is to test the “calories in minus calories out” definition for the reason body composition changes. It is of my opinion that with this diet, a shift of the entire metabolic efficiency in the body takes place. It is my understanding that it takes a combination of burning glucose with increased insulin levels for the body to store fat. Without these two, the adipose tissue will continue to absorb and release free fatty acids at will without holding on to them as stored triglycerides and hopefully burning or excreting the excess.
I have mainly come to this conclusion by reading Good Calories Bad Calories by Gary Taubes, and then following this up with more research in the science journals. This “metabolic advantage” that diets high in fat have compared to those high in carbohydrates has been hotly debated since the release of Taubes’ book. He makes an extremely good case as to why there is an advantage, when glucose and insulin are low in the diet. I have two separate papers, where each group of researchers clearly state that there definitively is or is not a “metabolic advantage”. I made a post on this subject a few days back that got no love, so check there for my full explanation. From the non-research side there has also been a decent amount of fighting back in forth. Anthony Colpo and Lyle McDonald have come out and called Taubes an idiot on multiple occasions. Neither has given a particularly good reason why he is wrong but both continue to behold the same underlying principle that calories counting is king. Colpo even offered a $20k challenge to Dr. Michael Eades, a firm believer of metabolic advantage, if he could disprove three claims laid out from Colpo that showed why no metabolic advantage. Here is a link to the feud.
There have been tightly controlled studies that have shown where individuals are locked in a metabolic ward for a few months a time with two groups consuming is caloric high carb or high fat diets. There has been no evidence to date that a high fat diet has any sort of advantage. Since the cost of these trials is so high they usually do not last long enough for any advantage to play itself out. It is my personal belief that to expose this advantage in a reasonable time frame, one must over consume a tremendous amount on a very strict diet for it to be seen.
I’ll guess we’ll see if there is any advantage for this diet for me. I am 27 and have been mainly sedentary for the last 5 years or so. I used to be very active in high school and a little with intra-murals in college, but since then have become very lazy, having little energy. Ever since high school I can remember never having the same energy as my friends. This gap seemed to widen when I graduated college. I would always be the first amongst my friends to want to go home when we went out and there were even a couple parties where I would just find a place to go to sleep. I routinely had an energy deficit with nearly everything I did. Perhaps I was depressed, but I just had nothing in me. I remember doing 3 sets of 20 pushups senior year in my room and taking over half an hour to recover. I was never obese, weighing between 180-190 and did go work out my upper body once a week on average, though I never had any energy to do more than a few exercises. I think I nearly died one day I decided to play soccer one morning after not sleeping one night. After pulling myself out of the game 15-20 minutes in, I laid down and suffered through the most excruciating internal chest pain I have ever had. It took me 10 minutes just to be able to stand up and the rest of the half to finally feel normal. I did eventually go back in and play a bit in the second half. My energy level continued to stay low and was very poor when I decided to give grad school a try. Several days I would come home for lunch, eat and then pass out on the floor not being able to sleep, but also having energy to go back to school to work.
I am going through all this because I believe I am extremely effected by carbohydrates. After going through parts of GCBC, I cleaned up my diet and within a week or so I started feeling much better. Out of nowhere my energy levels started rising and I rarely experienced the same kind of symptoms as before. I just felt better. For the first time in my life, I went to the gym consistently. This had never happened though I’d been telling all my friends for years that all I wanted to do was work out. It was finally happening and it hasn’t stopped since. It’s only been three months now but the progress I have made is incredible and I always maintain high energy at the gym. For the first time since I was under 21, I actually could go out at night, not drink, stay up the entire time and still have a good time.
I strongly believe this was not a result of just focusing harder or changing my internal mindset. I had seen therapists before and had not changed a single bit and perhaps was getting worse. I firmly believe that my body and brain were not being fed properly and this was accounting for my energy deficit. I still have symptoms of being lazy, but for the vast majority of the time I feel like I can finally go out and accomplish something without fear of not having energy.
From late September to early November, my diet was very strict and I probably averaged less than 50g per day and lost a few pounsd along the way. I had very impressive results at the gym as well gaining at least 30 pounds (20 more than PR) on my bench.
As I discussed previously the body will adapt to this carb-less environment and run entirely on ketones and free fatty acids. This period of adaptation usually takes 2-3 weeks and can take much longer for the full effects to occur. The body will be inefficient during this time and might waste some muscle along the way. I did go out drinking several times during october so I am not sure how much this effected my adaptation.
I have lots more to write but it’s getting too long.
My weight right now is 182.5
This is on the very low range of what it is has been at the last 6 years. I have not gotten a body-fat measuring but am guessing I am around 13-15%. Calories actually do count if your body fat is low enough. I think I am just above this threshold and so am not expecting to gain that much weight. Perhaps I will in the beginning but it should stabilize, as I think there is a limit of body-fat that the body will naturally adjust to on this diet.
I have also been 0 carb for the past week and should have emptied out any excess water that I would have lost from starting this thing fresh.
I am also going to log my strength training which should be primarily a SS routine with bench, squat, chins, and oly lifts and the occasional plyo thrown in.
Let it begin!
Edit/tsearcher: More discussion on this topic can be found in Greeksquared's preliminary thread: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/85...ciated-361553/
Last edited by tsearcher; 12-12-2008 at 12:10 AM.