Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
You seem to favor the administration of drugs, but also talk about cognitive therapy.
I already stated that drugs are a tool. No matter, you still have to learn to stay away from triggers and how to deal with anxiety/whatever, when it strikes.
Meds don't do anything but dull it out, unless you want to be zombified, which most psychiatrists are now careful not to do.
Quote:
I think there is plenty of evidence that a lot of different things can contribute to anxiety and changing things in ones life, behaving differently etc etc can help improve things.
Link?
Quote:
Drugs should be used as a last resort, not a first resort.
Do you honestly believe that people just run on out and get drugs to mess with their brains? It takes most people years upon years of denial, and trying their own half-baked ideas to "cure" themselves before they realize they need help.
Quote:
It is interesting that you compare that information to frontal lobotomies. I think the way drugs are distributed for mental disorders in 2009 is pretty much the frontal lobotomy of our time.
Frontal lobotomies basically destroyed many people's lives, and took away other important functions, drugs don't do the same thing.
Quote:
We don't, with any precision or accuracy, understand how or why they are helping, and certainly can not document consistent results. It is especially difficult because any judging criteria is likely wholly subjective.
This isn't true. Information and research has found pathogenic reasoning for many different problems. See my post above about wiring.
However, you are right that many drugs are not understood completely, but without you being a chemist, you would not know how a chemist works out these things.
Quote:
There are plenty of things people who suffer from anxiety can potentially do to help ease their anxiety without taking pills. I don't know what is in that book, but because it was written in the 1960s does not negate that it might provide useful information to help someone with anxiety.
Sure it does. Many things in psychiatry were not understood in those days.
Quote:
Do you think the only viable treatments for anxiety have been uncovered since the 70s?
Basically, all the current meds were developed since them. Lithium is the biggest exception of course.
Psychiatry is a very young field.
Quote:
Psychiatric meds are probably the least understood medications we use by a large amount.
I think you would be surprised.
Many of the drugs we now use, even OTC's aren't understood fully.
Quote:
Originally Posted by manylevels
Our thoughts becime our reality and our body reacts to that, thats the problem with anxiety, at 1 point your body will trigger your brain to think a certain way to get the same chemical reaction even you know you dont need to be afraid.
Okay, so you think that Anxiety is pathogenic. With your current reasoning, you put it in the same line as a heart attack.
Both use medicines.
Quote:
Try to contact someone with experience in meditation or hypnosis.
This line is horrible, you are suggesting that you are going to drop meds, which are proven to work from study after study, yet say that OP should us hypnosis, which is, at best, a parlor trick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackout
I saw a Neurologists (brain doctor) He's the one who put me on the drugs . My regular doctor did not want to give me a prescription till I saw this guy .
Rather interisting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by surftheiop
Definately see a psychiatrist and let him/her know your interested in trying to deal with this with as little medication as posible. If he doesn't do much psychotherapy then he can refer you to a good psychologist for cognitive counselling.
Any good psychiatrist will refer you to someone to work with, depending on your disorder.
As for using the least amount of meds possible, they hear it all the time. Eventually the patient crawls back after a truly effed up episode, asking for something that will hopefully prevent it from happening again.