Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerNemo
I agree with most of what uve stated. I would be all over the Pam if I didnt see at least half a dozen every time I go out. I think when spending that much money (might not be much to some, especially when talking about time pieces, but it's still a lot to me) I would like some exclusivity. With that said I'm leaning towards the Pilot chrono over the Omega.
So what would hold a better market value here? Pam, IWC, or Omega?
Thanks everyone for their input
Blah, it is nonsense that PAMs are everywhere. You might notice them more because you know watches and actively look at other people's wrists. But the fact remains that they are still "exclusive" due to the relatively low production runs.
IMO, buy whatever watch you desire most and will be happiest with. You cannot base your watch decision on others. It is your watch and you should be happy.
It seems that you wanted a PAM. I own a PAM 111. I prefer it over the 112. I like the motion and appearance of the seconds hand. Caseback is nice as well.
Both of the other watches you mention are not that "exclusive" either.
As far as holding value, you can't just mention a brand. It is watch specific within the brand.
For example, the base PAMs 000, 005, 111, and 112 will hold their value much better than the majority of other PAMs. These capture the essence of the company and will always be in demand, hence supporting their price. Many people who like Panerai will own multiple PAMs, and almost always their collection will include one of the base models.
The same is true with all watch brands, Rolex (Sub, GMT, Daytona), Omega (Planet Ocean) etc
But the most important thing is to make yourself happy the purchase.
IMO you should buy a mint condition used model if one of your concerns is maintaing value. You avoid the big value drop by buying used, and if you buy correctly you will get essentially a "brand new" watch.
Check timezone forum, watchuseek, watchnet, and rolexforums classifieds.
Good luck.