Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Micro Stakes Full Ring

Notices

Micro Stakes Full Ring Discussion of up to .25/.50 online no-limit pot-limit Texas hold'em full ring games, situations and strategies

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2008, 03:51 PM   #106
Notorious
 
Cry Me A River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,335
Re: Theory: Do-It-Yourself PT Stat Check-up Guide (Long)

(Open stickies are now permitted on a trial basis)
Cry Me A River is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 06:58 PM   #107
old hand
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,399
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

nm wrong stats, ill post later

Last edited by timhardawyhatesu; 04-08-2008 at 07:12 PM.
timhardawyhatesu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 10:35 PM   #108
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
RapidEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Back....and to the left..
Posts: 6,878
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Gobias, I'd try to get the hand samples a bit closer, because at these sample sizes, variance can be a basic reason for the difference. I also think that play on stars is tougher than FTP at 50 and 100 (can't say about anything higher). Great stuff, BTW!
RapidEvolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 12:02 PM   #109
veteran
 
sonneti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Space
Posts: 2,497
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Long term donkament player decided to have a go at cash for giggles.. This is the first 5k hands I've played on stars nl25.



I think I should be doing more of the following:

Opening slightly more buttons & co's.

Call a bit more in mulitway pots in late position with suited connecters.

Start playing draws more aggressively. I think I made a mistake calling because the players usually give me rediculous pot odds to draw and hardly ever fold when I do get there + I dont want to be reraised off strong draws so I'm closing the action on flop & turn.

I usually value bet 65-70% of the pot on the river blindly but I've been surprized how many people will fold when I think they have a decent hand. So I'll be betting less if I think its means they are a bit weaker.

Stop raising with small/medium pairs in early(ish) position. When I raise at this level I usually get 2 or 3 callers & a bunch of overcards so 77,88,99 dont play well without sets. This might be results orientated since I've hit very few sets over this 5k sample.

Muck AQ to almost any early/mid action pre-flop.

Check behind on the river when their draw hits!

Any ideas appreciated.
sonneti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 01:37 PM   #110
see my coaching listing
 
mpethybridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 79.17% dead, most likely
Posts: 14,303
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonneti View Post
Long term donkament player decided to have a go at cash for giggles.. This is the first 5k hands I've played on stars nl25.



I think I should be doing more of the following:

Opening slightly more buttons & co's. I agree. Maybe quite a bit more; try to raise about 25% of the time or so when you are on the button. To do this, you will absolutely have to go ahead and raise a fair number of hands with limpers ahead of you with modest starting hands.

Call a bit more in mulitway pots in late position with suited connecters.

Start playing draws more aggressively. I think I made a mistake calling because the players usually give me rediculous pot odds to draw and hardly ever fold when I do get there + I dont want to be reraised off strong draws so I'm closing the action on flop & turn. It's hard to tell this from your stats, but your turn and river aggression factors are a bit low. but this may be a sample size thing, 5000 hands is not enough to tell anything, really.

I usually value bet 65-70% of the pot on the river blindly but I've been surprized how many people will fold when I think they have a decent hand. So I'll be betting less if I think its means they are a bit weaker.

Stop raising with small/medium pairs in early(ish) position. When I raise at this level I usually get 2 or 3 callers & a bunch of overcards so 77,88,99 dont play well without sets. This might be results orientated since I've hit very few sets over this 5k sample. Hmm, not sure at all about this. I raise these hands routinely in EP at NL $50 and do fine.

Muck AQ to almost any early/mid action pre-flop.

Check behind on the river when their draw hits! Any river AF >2 is fine, imo, and you are right there. Based on your stats, I'm not sure you ought to make any change to your river lay at all. Maybe value bet a bit thinner a few times per thousand, and fold a few more times per thousand, but this would be so small an adjustment you could hardly even notice.

Any ideas appreciated.
comments in bold above
mpethybridge is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 09:16 PM   #111
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 65
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Hey first post here so feel free to correct me if i do anything wrong - just want to post my stats and check on peoples opinions and get some feedback. I just got poker office 2 weeks ago so here are my stats for the past 2 weeks.

$25nl - 11731 hands, +$568.1 - vpip% 15.1 - pfr% 8.4 - aggr factor post flop 4
aggr factor total 1.8. - att. to steal blinds% 21.1

$50nl-5420 hands, +$258.75 - vpip% 13.9 - pfr% 9.2 - aggr factor post flop 4.5
aggr factor total 2.5. - att. to steal blinds% 27.5

all comments and criticisms are welcome.
checkminraise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 09:48 AM   #112
adept
 
GrumpyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Down and Out in Paris
Posts: 747
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Rather than start a new thread, I thought I'd piggyback this W$WSF question onto this one. I hope that's OK.

This quote is from a recent thread in the beginners forum ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedJoker View Post
A W$WSF >40% is considered good for small stakes or lower. This thread should explain it a little better.
And if you read RedJoker's link, he says:

Quote:
W$WSF comes in 3 main categories:
<40%
40% - 45%
>45%
This is the <40% section:

Quote:
Nit

Typically playing tight preflop 17/12/3 type of opponent ....

These players will usually have a W$WSF below 40%. They give up on hands way too easily. Double barrel these guys. They don't value bet thin much and are never double barreling air. Give up if they get aggressive.
So I check out my stats and since I started playing closer to 17/14 than 22/11 (and improved my ptBB/100) my W$WSF has fallen to 35%.

First I panic, "Oh no, it's below 40% - I really, really suck" and then dive into this thread looking for fixes, only to find that a W$WSF of 35% seems to be quite common around here.

Are we all Nits?
GrumpyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 11:35 AM   #113
old hand
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,259
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

I'm just guessing but... was it 6max?
hackers238 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 11:51 AM   #114
old hand
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,259
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

And WTF is that FGators graph real? Anyone know?

He owns by straight stamina if it is.

Last edited by hackers238; 04-14-2008 at 11:57 AM.
hackers238 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 01:45 PM   #115
adept
 
GrumpyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Down and Out in Paris
Posts: 747
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by hackers238 View Post
I'm just guessing but... was it 6max?
Well, given that we FR players seem to be the geeky underclass of the online poker globe (or so the 'cool dudes' from the 6 max tables would have us believe) I'd say almost certainly yes.

So, I guess if the number of players seeing the flop in a FR game is, on average, higher - it would be reasonable for the W$WSF % to be lower?

Sounds reasonable.

I can calm down now then?
GrumpyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 01:34 AM   #116
adept
 
punish15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: making markets
Posts: 994
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Ok, I'm looking for some advice on general adjustments i should be making in my game. This is my first 10K stats at 50nl on FTP, mostly 9 tabling.





My WTSD in particular looks very low, am i missing out on value on later streets? am i too aggressive?
punish15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 03:38 AM   #117
Makes everything better
 
Bacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,984
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrumpyB View Post
Well, given that we FR players seem to be the geeky underclass of the online poker globe (or so the 'cool dudes' from the 6 max tables would have us believe) I'd say almost certainly yes.

So, I guess if the number of players seeing the flop in a FR game is, on average, higher - it would be reasonable for the W$WSF % to be lower?

Sounds reasonable.

I can calm down now then?
I think this is reasonable. Plus you're playing profitably - why fix a working strategy?

I think this is more relevant to higher stakes where there are less complete fish in our games. [checking my W$WSF%] Mine's at 38.28%. Heh. I play 16/10 - nitty and winning money
Bacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 03:42 AM   #118
Makes everything better
 
Bacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,984
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by punish15 View Post
Ok, I'm looking for some advice on general adjustments i should be making in my game. This is my first 10K stats at 50nl on FTP, mostly 9 tabling.

My WTSD in particular looks very low, am i missing out on value on later streets? am i too aggressive?
Stats do seem quite aggressive. FTP players will bet for you more often than not with my very limited experience. C/c with TPTK can be a profitable line sometimes too :P
Bacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 02:49 PM   #119
enthusiast
 
Slappper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 76
Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

last 10,000 k hand downswing and the only thing keepin me up is bonus monies, can anyone find something within my stats thats obvious?

and yes I am a nit.





and yes, i know 10,000 hands is still nothing but its a little substance to point things out.
Slappper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 05:08 PM   #120
banned
 
Chargers In 08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Peace.
Posts: 4,590
Smile Re: **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis Thread ****

Marc, open up in late position. The fact that your c/o vpip is higher than your buttons is really telling that you undervalue position. Stealing the blinds just 21% is just way to low. Get it up to 25%, then shoot for 30%, and then shoot for higher.

Your bb/100 in the bb is showing that you're valuing bad draws and top pair/no kicker type hands. It's ok to fold draws at times and don't get involved in big pots with top pair hands in limped pots. It is a small sample so you may have in fact hit a couple coolers but go through the hands and see what happened. Post hands if you have questions.
Chargers In 08 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive