10-19-2007
, 03:41 AM
BS,
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along.
IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play.
If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast.
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along.
IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play.
If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast.
10-19-2007
, 06:13 AM
hey that JJ hand was harsh timing out is soooo gay last night my uni net decided to blow out when i flopped a set , so sick. The video was pretty good, your running commentary was good too.
As for the next, i say another 4table 50nl
ty ty ty ty ty ty ty
timing out is soooo gay last night my uni net decided to blow out when i flopped a set , so sick. The video was pretty good, your running commentary was good too.As for the next, i say another 4table 50nl
ty ty ty ty ty ty ty
10-19-2007
, 11:25 AM
Quote:
BS,
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along.
IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play.
If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast.
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along.
IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play.
If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast.
// M
10-19-2007
, 11:54 AM
Quote:
BS,
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along.
IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play.
If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast.
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along.
IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play.
If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast.
LC, I really think your game will improve more from seeing how someone handles good players than bad ones (all relative).
it is much easier to dumb yourself down than dumb yourself up
im sure im being selfish though, as i really want to move to 100 soon and need reassurance its not that different
10-19-2007
, 10:02 PM
10-19-2007
, 11:45 PM
10-20-2007
, 05:42 AM
Quote:
thanks for the video bottomset, apart from playing I liked your voice too(hope it doesn't come out gay).
Thanks for the vid, I'll be sure to check out the others.BTW if anyone's getting audio only (and can't be bothered to search) you need the TSCC codec at http://www.techsmith.com/download/codecs.asp.
10-20-2007
, 04:32 PM
Quote:
You don't sound like your picture Thanks for the vid, I'll be sure to check out the others.
BTW if anyone's getting audio only (and can't be bothered to search) you need the TSCC codec at http://www.techsmith.com/download/codecs.asp.
Quote:
thanks for the video bottomset, apart from playing I liked your voice too(hope it doesn't come out gay).
Thanks for the vid, I'll be sure to check out the others.BTW if anyone's getting audio only (and can't be bothered to search) you need the TSCC codec at http://www.techsmith.com/download/codecs.asp.
10-21-2007
, 03:16 AM
10-23-2007
, 09:47 AM
