Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Micro Stakes Full Ring

Notices

Micro Stakes Full Ring Discussion of up to .25/.50 online no-limit pot-limit Texas hold'em full ring games, situations and strategies

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2012, 07:32 PM   #1
Who killed me?
 
nismo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Howard Lederer's pocket
Posts: 4,506
NL5 - Weak ace versus nit

The villain is 9/6/1 rock over 55 hands with 50% fold to cbet

Im a bit stumped on the turn. Villain is one of those mass multitabling SSer nits so i am assuming he has solid values. Should i be c/f on turn? I dont see myself getting any value.


Poker Stars $5.00 No Limit Hold'em - 7 players
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

Hero (SB): $5.08
BB: $2.03
UTG: $4.38
UTG+1: $4.91
MP: $2.07
CO: $3.88
BTN: $6.57

Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero is SB with A 2
5 folds, Hero raises to $0.16, BB calls $0.11

Flop: ($0.32) A 7 3 (2 players)
Hero bets $0.20, BB calls $0.20

Turn: ($0.72) 7 (2 players)
Hero ???

OPEN SPOILER FOR REST OF HAND

Spoiler:
nismo9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 08:20 PM   #2
grinder
 
bull699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: London town
Posts: 609
Yeah I pretty much c/f turn...he's not calling another street with a lower pp and there are so many Ax in his range that you're gonna value cut yourself against
bull699 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 09:33 PM   #3
Pooh-Bah
 
mtagliaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hijack+4 (prime stealing pos)
Posts: 4,533
Re: NL5 - Weak ace versus nit

agreed, c/f turn.
mtagliaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2012, 02:46 AM   #4
old hand
 
vrbik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Czech Republic - Prague
Posts: 1,409
Re: NL5 - Weak ace versus nit

c/f turn c/f river
vrbik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2012, 03:37 AM   #5
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
MartL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Following tiltedpoker.org
Posts: 9,144
Re: NL5 - Weak ace versus nit

check/call flop, check/call Turn.

We dont win much in these situations. He either has an Ace or he dosnt so if we cbet they fold a ton here so I like to give them chance to at least try and bluff. If they dont bet the flop Im min betting turn and river.
MartL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2012, 09:07 AM   #6
grinder
 
bull699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: London town
Posts: 609
C/c the flop seems awful here. Without further reads what makes us think he's ever bluffing the flop? After his action pre, what range do you put him on when he bets out verses our missed cbet?

After thinking about the hand a bit more I actually feel it might be a c/f otf. There's so much Ax in his range and we can get value from his pp's on later streets. His range is so narrow that we're either way behind or we're giving him a free draw to a two outer.

If we knew a bit more about villain maybe we could think about cbetting and barreling him off stronger Ax
bull699 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2012, 10:21 AM   #7
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
MartL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Following tiltedpoker.org
Posts: 9,144
Re: NL5 - Weak ace versus nit

Quote:
Originally Posted by bull699 View Post
C/c the flop seems awful here. Without further reads what makes us think he's ever bluffing the flop? After his action pre, what range do you put him on when he bets out verses our missed cbet?

After thinking about the hand a bit more I actually feel it might be a c/f otf. There's so much Ax in his range and we can get value from his pp's on later streets. His range is so narrow that we're either way behind or we're giving him a free draw to a two outer.

If we knew a bit more about villain maybe we could think about cbetting and barreling him off stronger Ax
A lot of nits will bet when checked to so his range if he bets the flop will be 22-JJ(presuming he 3bets better and calls those) Obviously he has Ax but probably has stuff like KQ/KJ/QJ/QT/JT etc(tons more combos we beat than Ax) in his range and he will bet that stuff some of the time.

Some nits will check behind with that stuff which im fine with hence the min betting and trying to make them look stupid. Imo i think we get more value by check/call 2 streets than we do betting 2 streets and I think this could be easily proved if we had a ton of hands on the player and knew more about him but remember it is still only 55 hands so he could easily be card dead and he has probably at most only faced a couple of cbets so the fold to cbet stat is irrelevant. for those reasons alone check/folding this flop is very bad.
MartL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2012, 10:21 AM   #8
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 399
Re: NL5 - Weak ace versus nit

Bet/fold turn (to extract value from his pot-controlled underpairs) and bet/fold river when you collect some higher hand equity.

Last edited by RajHendon; 08-06-2012 at 10:26 AM.
RajHendon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive