+1000000 trying to play LAG vs a table full of stations who hate folding is never going to make you any money. i know people love to put cool labels on their playing style and want to embrace a certain style to call their own, but ive been trying to say this forever...its not about having a certain style, ITS ABOUT ADJUSTMENT.

It's definately about adjustment. One of the hardest things for me to learn is how to adjust to other TAGs. Since I worked my way up, I still find myself in the mindset of looking for fat value against Fish and aggro tards. Learning ways to take advantage of TAGs is just another weapon in my arsenal. I still make most of my money off of fish and bad LAGs, but its nice to be able to eek out a profit on TAGs as well. Now if only I could figure out how to attack the damn good lags.....

mother effing bingO

sick post. +EV.

Amazing post Split.

I loved everything except for your deffinition of LAG:

This is still solid TAG play and EVERYONE should learn it if they wish to progress beyond the micros. The vast majority of us are at the micros to learn not earn. As the game continues to get tougher it becomes more important to maximize winrates. It may cut down on the number of tables played but notice high stake pros aren't playing 6+ tables and I am willing to make a PSB they make more/hr then the best micro grinder...but I digress.

As Split explains it this style isn't about pre flop numbers at all but learning to aply more pressure when proffitable to do so. It is about learning to play situationaly and increasing the number of proffitable hands in your arsenol and playing your opponents and their cards as well as your own.

So what is my deffinition of LAG? It doesn't belong in this well written post.

thank you =)

glad you liked it. if you come up with a better definition i will consider editing the OP =)

What about opening any Axs? Here is my reasoning:

1. In terms of pure equity, A2s is actually better than KQs or any other unpaired non-A hand. If you flop the nut flush draw you're also at least 40% against a typical range. Since its equity is as good as KQs and I always open KQs, I don't think playing Axs can be much of a mistake. It's not even that tough to play postflop.
2. It has a lot of cooler potential. People will play AK strong on a flop like A46 rainbow and you'll be there with A6s. They won't have any safe flops and this is helpful for balance. Similarly, when raising UTG, people will put you on a strong range and try to hit a flush with 76s etc. but you'll have the nut flush. Another case might be when again someone calls your raise with a speculative hand like 89s and the flop is 88K. You will hold A8s and the best trips. Easy game. All this cooler potential should make up for the small pots lost when you have TP but are outkicked.
3. Your bluffs will be more effective. Since you'll often have a flush draw and an A on the turn will also be very real, bluffs will get more respect.
4. Most weak A will fold to your raise so domination is not a big issue. For example, I expect A2o-A9o to fold to our raise. It's also not as if you'll play A6s for a big pot when hitting TP.

If this is too much, how about opening A2s-A5s and A9s+ UTG while opening any Axs in every other position. The wheel potential should matter more than the better kicker against a tight range. For example, in terms of kicker, I am playing A2s the same as A8s.

Leak or good for a LAG with strong postflop skills?

BTW: I don't think one should call raises with Axs unless there is a caller in front.

The above was regarding 6-max not full-ring. Sorry! I didn't realize it was the full-ring section.

I know it's been a couple years but I want to say thanks for this great post. I'm currently playing 4NL on Merge and would love to try this but I'm not sure if that's such a good idea. Like others have said, I guess it depends on how tight the tables generally are and wether or not players are willing to fold.

glad you enjoyed it =)

Anti-Archive bump.

People might call me a LAG. I play more hands than TAGs. But I think what people do not know about is that because you are looser in your hand selections than more people it does not mean you are not tight.

There's two forms of tightness in my opinion...

Hand Selection and How You Play Your Money.

please be the second coming of joyofpoker please please please

In case you are wondering why all the bumps for cotw threads. 2+2 is about to update the forum software and will be archiving all threads that have not been active since last February. Since the COTW threads are invaluable I am going back through cotw threads from 20009. Trying to do it all in one go during the night to lessen annoyance of taking up space in the unl forum.

A few years ago, when I first started taking poker seriously I played on the nit side of a standard TAG player. After taking a long poker break, I returned and began playing HU only, both cash & sngs. Since I'm on merge right now and hate playing super-turbo husng's, I've gotten back into micro-full ring. With-out thinking my full-ring game had changed, as the stats kept building I was surprised to find out that I had naturally started playing more LAGgy. In short playing heads-up and studying HU strategy, especially aspects on how to wisely apply aggression, will make you better at hand reading and playing weaker flop holdings when applying those skills in a FR game.