Hand 1: I assume you mean that the BB is 42/0. Surely you understand that it's your reads on the SB (not provided) which are most important in respect of your decision to 4bet or flat?!
Hand 2: That 4bet is so small that setmining IP is just about acceptable...although are you folding on a 225 flop? How does villain see you? What do you think his 4bet range in this spot is?
We have a one hand per thread rule in this forum (as per the stickies), so I'll leave it there.
H1 - what's our read on SB? if SB 3bets light then I think 4betting is good since a whale who may call your 4bet is involved. But I flat here vs unknowns.
H2 - I'm not really sure what we're trying to accomplish by 3betting. Are we betting for value?
H3 - If we really think that villain's range is draw-heavy then I don't think betting the river accomplishes much as we're just getting worse hands to fold. Only hands that we are bluffing out are probably JsTs, QsJs and KsJs. And I don't think mid and small pairs are calling on that particular board so I just check back.
H1 - what's our read on SB? if SB 3bets light then I think 4betting is good since a whale who may call your 4bet is involved. But I flat here vs unknowns.
SB had been 3betting rather frequently, he sat on several of my tables.
Hand 1 - We need reads on SB but I'm happy to flat here. If 4betting isolates the fish then that's okay but there's no way to tell that given the sb's range is unknown. In general I still prefer flatting and playing the hand ip
Hand 2 - What is the MP's fold to 3bet% ? I flat here as he's unlikely to be calling us with anything worse.
Hand 3 - I don't know what you are trying to achieve with the river bet. No worse hands will call but if he was drawing to the nut flush and has the A then you are just valuetowning yourself.
Hand 4 - Why are you 3betting a super nit's utg raise?
Make sure you don't make the common misconception of allowing his bad play to de value your perception of his raising hand strength. His mistake is that he calls too much - not that he raises too much. He hasn't raised a single hand in 72 hands. When he raises, alarm bells should be going off.
Hand 2 flat - likely a decent reg with those stats who probably isn't calling with worse if you 3bet.
3betting puts you in awkward spots if he 4bets - you either have to fold which is not great because your turning JJ into a bluff, flat which is also bad because of reduced SPR/the fact your essentially set mining flop and have to fold if you miss, or 6bet jam which is also bad.
Hand 3 check river - I don't mind turn barrel but river bet is horrible.
You never get called by worse. You also mention "A lot of FD's in villain ranges".
If this is the case our river bet accomplishes nothing. Bar getting called by better.
If you were ever trying to make a case for betting river, you need to tailor your bet sizing around a range which can call a river bet and the texture of the board.
So you need to ask yourself, can a $14.70 river bet get called by worse than 1010 on 945JA?
Answer, no.
So if anything, bet like $4 on the river to get called by 910s etc.
Hand 3 - I don't know what you are trying to achieve with the river bet. No worse hands will call but if he was drawing to the nut flush and has the A then you are just valuetowning yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GIMMETHECHIPS
So you need to ask yourself, can a $14.70 river bet get called by worse than 1010 on 945JA?
Answer, no.
True but this reasoning doesn't fully apply here. KJs, QJs, JTs are definitely in this villain's range and while he won't call a big river bet with them, they do beat us at showdown when we check back.
So I can understand OP betting as a bluff against that part of his range if he has some reads, but that's the only benefit of betting and it doesn't outweigh checking back. We're either winning a relatively small non-showdown pot or lose a big one, so yes checking is better, especially against an unknown.
ppl have KK+ in FR a lot when they 4bet preflop, you should fold your marginal holdings such as JJ/QQ/AK very often to a lot of preflop aggression
hand 1 is an easy call pre
hand 2 is a fold
hand 3 not sure why you play so aggressively, your TTs are good pretty often here; bluffing is probably okay but I'm not sure you know why you're betting
hand 4 is a fold