Quote:
Originally Posted by unicorn_lord
so you're saying charging entrants 500 dollars to enter a award show like IGF, so you could use it as an earn promotion. and it then came out it was rigged to support people in line with a PR firm, Absolute nothing wrong there.
Right, like someone said above, I have no idea what this means. I can piece together the context but who or what is IGF, what is a "earn promotion", etc. It's hard to the uninitiated to follow when the subject matter is so obscure.
Quote:
That your development was actively and openly threatened by this same group of people, there's nothing wrong there as well?
Development of what? Again, don't assume your audience knows what your acronyms and pronouns refer to.
Quote:
That in investigating this said group will result in your personal information leaked and given to an angry mob to silence you?
It seemed like the people who were having stuff leaked were not from your side. Like, even if Quinn made up/embellished things that happened to her, which it seems like she did, I'm not seeing where 4chaners or anyone from that side got got. I see where some websites deleted comments about it, and that's dumb, but it's dumb because this is the internet and just because you keep information off
your site doesn't mean it goes away.
Quote:
That openly cenorship of conversation, the belittlement of your own audience, while supporting people who have incredibly shading past because they'll label you a pedophile for even questioning them?
Again, lol internet censorship, and where is the second half of that coming from?
Quote:
THAT'S ****ING FINE WITH YOU?
You seem really mad. Also you edit quickly.
Quote:
Full tilt was a great company, wasn't it?
No, it was bad, which is why, despite their best efforts to hide the truth, news of how awful it was got out and those people that got defrauded got/are getting their money back.
The thing that makes the FT story easy to understand for those that didn't play is that the mission statement is easy to understand:
FTP was a gaming site that claimed to be holding players money in escrow but really wasn't and stole from those players by mismanaging funds upwards of one hundred million dollars.
See, even if you barely understand that online gaming is a thing, you can understand what happened, who is involved, for how much and why it's wrong.
If I try to broad stroke this one I get:
"A bunch of gaming websites got too chumy with the gaming companies they were trying to report on, not unlike major news outlets being too influenced by companies that advertise with them."
That's obviously bad, but your level of outrage doesn't seem to fit.