Quote:
Originally Posted by cwar
I guess I just don't understand how it's functionally different than hoping say Ad Naseum or Modern Burn and hoping they don't hit (a format that people love). Furthermore, it's not as if hitting Ulamog ends the game, it doesn't instantly turn around a losing position nor does lock up a win from even in all spots. That was a legitimate complaint of Emrakul. Nor does Marvel restrict deck building to any degree close to Saheeli.
I think Standard would be a lot worse if the whole thing was just aggro-midrange vs. aggro-midrange which seems likely if you were to remove Marvel.
I mean look back at Mardu Vehicles now, isn't it a totally fair deck now that we've seen it was at the top based on circumstances instead of raw power or something being broken? People are just going to hate any deck that is the best and occupying >30% of the meta. Maybe that happens with Marvel, maybe that doesn't, there's going to be a lot of readjusting decks now that Marvel + Zombies are the clear target.
well in modern people sign up for this type of stuff, theres also super powerful 1+2 mana answers that make post board games super tilted to the non combo/non burn decks favour.
spell pierce, surgical extraction, negate, thoughtsieze, cannonist
wizard doesn't print hosers or super cheap disruption in standard anymore so its not fair to compare like this