Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Sports and Games > Video Games

Notices

Video Games Discussion of video games and the systems on which they're played

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2012, 05:44 PM   #61
journeyman
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 220
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82 View Post
IMO calling WoW one of the top 3 games ever created is like calling the McDonalds double cheeseburger one of the top 3 hamburgers ever created.

Sure they've sold 978 trillion of them and everyone eats them, but it has nothing to do with quality.

Just depends on what your definition of a "top game" is, I guess.

Any list like this is just going to be terrible because of the sheer scope of it. I mean, we're talking about a list where Ms. Pac Man, Angry Birds, World of Warcraft, and Grand Theft Auto are all contenders. How can you really devise a metric that compares one to the other?

Toss in a healthy dose of nostalgia and rose colored glasses from anyone making a list like this, and there's just no way to make a "quality" list whatsoever.

Hopefully it's an entertaining read, at least.
this isn't fair, it's a very quality game with a ton of effort put into it. there are very few video game experiences as great as downing a difficult boss in WoW with your raid group, and thats a direct result of the high quality design of the game. that's saying nothing for just how huge and immersive the world is.
vlad fightmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 05:58 PM   #62
Pooh-Bah
 
starvingwriter82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,951
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s View Post
Going to guess you're younger than 25.
Some of those I could forgive, but I'm pretty sure absolutely everyone over 25 who's ever played a video game at knows at least NBA Jam and OutRun.

Was kind of surprised Maniac Mansion 2 beat out Secret of Monkey Island as the representative point-and-click (personally I prefer Full Throttle or Zak McKracken and the Alien Mindbenders, but I accept they might not be the best representative for the genre), but hey, if you only get one slot....

Also kind of sad that the only Ultima game represented is Ultima Online, but although the Ultima series blew the market open with what you could do in terms of story, depth, and non-linear play (For those under 25 - Final Fantasy is more "Diablo", Ultima is more "Elder Scrolls"), unfortunately, the games age really poorly in terms of graphics, controls, and gameplay.

There we go. Now I just have to work in a reference to text adventures and you should be able to guess my age down to the month.
starvingwriter82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 06:22 PM   #63
Pooh-Bah
 
starvingwriter82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,951
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by vlad fightmaster View Post
this isn't fair, it's a very quality game with a ton of effort put into it. there are very few video game experiences as great as downing a difficult boss in WoW with your raid group, and thats a direct result of the high quality design of the game. that's saying nothing for just how huge and immersive the world is.
Downing a difficult boss with a raid group is definitely an awesome experience, but once you've played the game for maybe ten hours or so, you've seen 98% of the content. All the quests are nearly identical variations of one another and most of the new skills your character gets as they level are just straight upgrades of skills you already have.

WoW is the pinnacle of what Blizzard does best: take a repetitive grindfest of a game and figure out the exact minimum amount of fun required to keep the majority addicted, sprinkle it in, and bam!, best seller.

Obviously I can't speak for everyone, but that's my opinion. The community aspect of raiding keeps people plugged in a lot longer than they otherwise would be. Other than that, most of the game isn't "doing fun stuff" it's "doing boring stuff over and over to get a fun reward."

When I played WoW and was on the cutting edge of figuring out boss encounters, etc. yes, that was fun. Then there were all the other nights of the week when we cleared boring raids for the 40th time practically on autopilot because hey, no one's having fun, but we need to do it anyway so we can get the gear to participate in the potentially fun stuff later down the road.

Sorry, but any game that takes 39 of your friends to help you do something boring for hours so you can get two or three items that *maybe* someone can use, then asks you to repeat that boring activity for weeks, so you can have a bit of fun trying a new encounter before repeating the entire process again, that game has some pretty serious design flaws imo.

...and that's just the raiding. Stuff like faction and rep quests are just a straight up middle finger to players.

Players: "So, is WoW more repetitive than Space Invaders?"
Blizzard: "Not yet, but we'll get there, don't worry."

Edit: Note in an above post I did say I'm fine with WoW being on this list. The sheer number of players and total hours spent in game just make it impossible to leave off. But just because a game supplies people with community and does a great job of balancing grind/fun ratio doesn't automatically make it "high quality" imo.

Last edited by starvingwriter82; 06-17-2012 at 06:31 PM.
starvingwriter82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 06:35 PM   #64
Pooh-Bah
 
topher123890's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: It's starting to get a lot annoying
Posts: 3,823
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

You clearly haven't played WoW in a long time, because so much of what you said in that post doesn't apply anymore.

I don't want to get roped in to a discussion on this though so I'll hopefully stay out of this thread now
topher123890 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 06:50 PM   #65
veteran
 
templar rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,389
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuntMonkey View Post
hahaha



SMB3 and LTTP are not "dated" in the same way that FF7 and MGS are. That Playstation 1 3D looks awful now (I kinda love it and think it's charming, but it's definitely dated). Super Mario 64 and Ocarina also are early 3D but age slightly better graphics-wise than FF7 and MGS.



My quest is for truth, not bias in favor of Nintendo or anyone else. If anything I am a Sony fanboy nowadays, and I hate it when people overrate N64 games. That being said, Mario 64 and Ocarina are pretty rock solid top 5'ers (the thing is, those are arguably the only N64 games that belong in the top 100 except for imo Banjo-Kazooie). Mario 64's low placement (#41) is actually the biggest snub in terms of ranking.

The FF series is really not that special. FF7 is cool because of how groundbreaking the graphics were at the time, the detailed depressing environments, the music, etc. I wouldn't complain about it being in somebody's top 10, and yet I also wouldn't think about it for more than 35 seconds if it didn't show up on a top 100 at all. It's basically FF6 with 1997 graphics. And any talk of FF that brings "story" into the discussion is ridiculous.
Can't believe I (and they) forgot this game. At least personally, it's top 3 OAT for me and just about the only game > 10 years old that I still play regularly.
templar rage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 07:13 PM   #66
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
bbfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,282
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Imo missing from the list that haven't been mentioned I think:
-Fire Emblem rep
-Perfect Dark
-Resident Evil 1 (just put it instead of 4)
-Suikoden rep
-Earthbound
-The Simpsons arcade game
-Xenogears rep maybe
-Okami maybe
-Star Ocean rep
-Tales Of rep
Timesplitters rep
bbfg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 07:19 PM   #67
journeyman
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 220
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82 View Post
Downing a difficult boss with a raid group is definitely an awesome experience, but once you've played the game for maybe ten hours or so, you've seen 98% of the content. All the quests are nearly identical variations of one another and most of the new skills your character gets as they level are just straight upgrades of skills you already have.

WoW is the pinnacle of what Blizzard does best: take a repetitive grindfest of a game and figure out the exact minimum amount of fun required to keep the majority addicted, sprinkle it in, and bam!, best seller.

Obviously I can't speak for everyone, but that's my opinion. The community aspect of raiding keeps people plugged in a lot longer than they otherwise would be. Other than that, most of the game isn't "doing fun stuff" it's "doing boring stuff over and over to get a fun reward."

When I played WoW and was on the cutting edge of figuring out boss encounters, etc. yes, that was fun. Then there were all the other nights of the week when we cleared boring raids for the 40th time practically on autopilot because hey, no one's having fun, but we need to do it anyway so we can get the gear to participate in the potentially fun stuff later down the road.

Sorry, but any game that takes 39 of your friends to help you do something boring for hours so you can get two or three items that *maybe* someone can use, then asks you to repeat that boring activity for weeks, so you can have a bit of fun trying a new encounter before repeating the entire process again, that game has some pretty serious design flaws imo.

...and that's just the raiding. Stuff like faction and rep quests are just a straight up middle finger to players.

Players: "So, is WoW more repetitive than Space Invaders?"
Blizzard: "Not yet, but we'll get there, don't worry."

Edit: Note in an above post I did say I'm fine with WoW being on this list. The sheer number of players and total hours spent in game just make it impossible to leave off. But just because a game supplies people with community and does a great job of balancing grind/fun ratio doesn't automatically make it "high quality" imo.
you're just wrong

there's a number of different ways to play each class, many requiring some higher level skills to be played properly. every class i played would switch to a different play style as i leveled up.

quests are tied into the lore of the area they're in very well. they're reasonably diverse -- the idea that they're all kill x monster or collect x item is really silly and i could prob give literally 100 different examples of at least somewhat interesting and immersive quests in the game. i feel like wow gets this rep because at times you'll just get inundated with quests at times so it's easy to see the kill x or collect x quests and wish they weren't there cluttering your quest journal.

as for raids, i haven't raided since TBC (which i hear is among the best time to raid in the game) but from my experience there was never a time when my raid group wasn't pushing content. yes we would kill certain bosses a number of times but never was there a time when it was just boring autopilot (gruul was prob the best example of a boss needing to be killed more often than it should because of the rogue trinket he dropped, but even then i still had fun with the fight), a single split second loss of concentration could cause a wipe. mt hyjal was unbelievably epic and downing archimonde was amazing (more so than illidan imo). on top of that, i've never had more fun in any video game than fighting lady vashj, not even close.

entirely agreed on rep quests, i tried to start playing again but rep quests made me stop. they're ridiculous and i hate them with a passion. the only thing i'll say about them is that by the time you get to the point that they're important, you've already put what...100+ hours into the game? tell me a game that doesn't start getting unbearably repetitive at 100+ hours

avalanche of diverse content and areas, extremely fun and interesting boss battles, many novels worth of lore woven into the game seamlessly, living breathing changing world, the very definition of epic in a video game. yes it's grindy at times (although, imo, this doesn't become really annoying until you hit max level) and can be game-breakingly so for many people when it comes to rep quests. but come on, saying this game isn't high quality is just nonsense. save that for the zynga games or ****ty little iphone games.
vlad fightmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 07:22 PM   #68
journeyman
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 220
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbfg View Post
Imo missing from the list that haven't been mentioned I think:
-Fire Emblem rep
-Perfect Dark
-Resident Evil 1 (just put it instead of 4)
-Suikoden rep
-Earthbound
-The Simpsons arcade game
-Xenogears rep maybe
-Okami maybe
-Star Ocean rep
-Tales Of rep
Timesplitters rep
agreed with earthbound, although i got the feeling chrono trigger kinda reps that era of rpgs. also agreed with simpsons arcade game, such a stupid amount of fun.

rest i dunno, suikoden 2 was an amazing game but never got as popular as it really deserved and xenogears would have been amazing too if it didn't turn into a slideshow at disc 2.
vlad fightmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 08:15 PM   #69
Pooh-Bah
 
starvingwriter82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,951
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by vlad fightmaster View Post
but come on, saying this game isn't high quality is just nonsense. save that for the zynga games or ****ty little iphone games.
Well, it's just my opinion. I guess from when I played (and as someone pointed out above, it was quite awhile ago) I spent most of my time at the max level and raiding, which is where the repetition gets really bad. It's like there's interesting content as you level, then suddenly a massive grind, then a limited amount of more exciting content after that.

There *is* quality in WoW, for sure. The grind to quality/fun ratio is just way off imo. I'd rather play a game that's fun for 10 hours and then I've run out of content, than a game that's fun for 12 hours but I have to play for 100 to experience it all.
starvingwriter82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 08:29 PM   #70
journeyman
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 220
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82 View Post
Well, it's just my opinion. I guess from when I played (and as someone pointed out above, it was quite awhile ago) I spent most of my time at the max level and raiding, which is where the repetition gets really bad. It's like there's interesting content as you level, then suddenly a massive grind, then a limited amount of more exciting content after that.

There *is* quality in WoW, for sure. The grind to quality/fun ratio is just way off imo. I'd rather play a game that's fun for 10 hours and then I've run out of content, than a game that's fun for 12 hours but I have to play for 100 to experience it all.
it's really a matter of personal bias. like i said i tried to get back into the game but the firelands rep quests made me want to gouge my eyes out. I understand what you mean about the grind/fun ratio; there's 3 very identifiable sections of the game imo, pre max lvl, hitting max lvl and gearing up for end game stuff, doing end game stuff. that second section is painful and lasts far longer than it should.

focusing on that and ignoring how diverse and immersive pre max lvl is or how epic/fun end game content is just isn't at all fair.
vlad fightmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 08:40 PM   #71
too late axe in car
 
Byrung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: angleshooting bingo sloots
Posts: 3,179
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daer View Post
MGS is a pile of incoherent ****. People who think the MGS series has a good story are legit retarded.
yeah god forbid other people like a game that you dont. Better yet just because someone else likes something you dont lets call them retarded!

Daer confirmed mad
Byrung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 08:42 PM   #72
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
JuntMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,384
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by IHeartAsians View Post
Wait a minute....

Where the **** is Tomb Raider?
It's not that great a game maybe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82 View Post
Some of those I could forgive, but I'm pretty sure absolutely everyone over 25 who's ever played a video game at knows at least NBA Jam and OutRun.

Was kind of surprised Maniac Mansion 2 beat out Secret of Monkey Island as the representative point-and-click (personally I prefer Full Throttle or Zak McKracken and the Alien Mindbenders, but I accept they might not be the best representative for the genre), but hey, if you only get one slot....

Also kind of sad that the only Ultima game represented is Ultima Online, but although the Ultima series blew the market open with what you could do in terms of story, depth, and non-linear play (For those under 25 - Final Fantasy is more "Diablo", Ultima is more "Elder Scrolls"), unfortunately, the games age really poorly in terms of graphics, controls, and gameplay.

There we go. Now I just have to work in a reference to text adventures and you should be able to guess my age down to the month.
November of '77
JuntMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 08:49 PM   #73
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Daer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A real rainbow likening luck stop
Posts: 11,924
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrung View Post
yeah god forbid other people like a game that you dont. Better yet just because someone else likes something you dont lets call them retarded!

Daer confirmed mad
Confirmed liked MGS's story.
Daer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 09:12 PM   #74
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Richard Tanner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,985
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daer View Post
Confirmed liked MGS's story.
MSG had a good story.

WoW is not a good game (it's obv popular)

Advance upon me Brethren!
Richard Tanner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2012, 10:11 PM   #75
Outside the Box
 
fanapathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Between Scylla and Charybdis
Posts: 2,370
Re: G4's top 100 games of all time

Jopke list as usual...any point in pointing out why even? GoW3 is clearly not the best game in the series and probably shouldn't be on the list at all, OoT is a top3 game and original LoZ shouldn't be there (or that high)

Doom II, um, why the sequel?

Bioshock a triple joke. For being in #3 and that it was in any way better than similar games Deus Ex or SS2.

Rock Band 3? This was released when the genre was already beaten to death

Shadow of the Colossus #9, ok ok very funny.
Portal was a couple of hours of a fun experimental "game" so why not rank it HIGHER than HL, HL2 the episodes and everything else that's not even there

Ms Pacman and no Pacman just proves that this has to be what NVGers call a level

Then again that's the reaction they want isn't it. Sigh
fanapathy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive