Quote:
Originally Posted by ratslla
Yes and no. Would u say the same thing if G2 was still as "bad" as they were a few weeks/months ago and Faze didn't step it up a bit aswell?
The system is straight up bad and led to a horrible result. Basing seeding on a single result is a terrible idea. The fact that result is months old makes it worse.
You could have a team come out right after the previous major, smash everyone, and they can't be seeded in the first or second pool. They could literally win every tournament and it wouldn't matter. They would still be a pool 3 team.
At no point in time was CLG, Astralis, gambit, and dignitas similar in strength to SK(LG), Fnatic, G2, and Faze.
Also, keep in mind a large part of G2/Faze's upswings were due to roster changes. Any reasonable system would heavily favor results of the actual roster they are playing with.
Even if seedings were locked a month out you've got a group with 3 teams arguably weaker than the worst team in another group.
Last edited by TheJacob; 07-01-2016 at 11:04 AM.