I need someone to spot the leaks between these two stats and explain to me few things that I will ask down below.
The number '1.)' stats are from me trying to play more exploitative and the number '2.)' stats are from me playing just standard lines like a robot.
My questions (despite the volume):
a) By playing exploitative my 3bet has gone up very very much, because I would raise any 2 cards if the spot seemed good enough to take down the pot right there preflop. However, I'm losing money despite my 3bet success being much better (I think, I hope someone could give me instruction in how to filter out in PT4 preflop 3b/4b success).
Does 3 betting success necessarily mean more money won? Because it seems that I've made more money previously by just calling pre and winning pot postflop, with hands that I would exploitatively now 3bet.
If flop goes check-check, I do bluff the turn and river in 90% of time (however, I yet again don't know how to filter out hands where flop goes check-check in SRP, and I bet the turn and river).
b) Also these questions I've already posted on PT4 forum -
https://www.pokertracker.com/forums/...p?f=61&t=92205
c) Is playing exploitative in micros even worth it? I did bluff A LOT more in spots I think were really good in 3b/4b pots and got called by some very very loose hands vs regs, that I don't think should be there in the first place.
So this just goes back to the question, should we even bluff at micros? I've seen all kinds of loose calls in 3b pots vs regs that I don't know how they even called me, because I represented set or 2p+ in spots when I 3 barrel, and they call me off with only TP.
d) Leaks in my stats, when you compare them? Wtf did I do so right when I played straight forward non-exploitive poker?