Quote:
Originally Posted by ProStyler
Hey everybody,
first of all want to give you anticipated thanks who read this until the end, because I need some help and it's greatly appreciated, and the first step by you is read it. Said that, I proceed to explain why can you read this today:
Don't want to ask help... anyway I'll do it; this is the first of this kind post by my side, and I decided to do this because I feel a bit(perhaps a lot) lost in the way of improve, when I focus on think how to play better and try to do it there is a brainteaser in certain aspects, like don't feel confortable being agressive without well understanding of why I'm being in every situation/spot, or be too tight because this mean loss ev+ opportunities...
Want to work to find balance in my actions in each street and all them in conjunction. Just want to be in the way of the improve and feel am in it, I know really need strictly organization for improve with a daily/weekly tracking of my learning; I'm sure that still am growing a lot because I've much less doubts compared with previous sessions and 've by far better poker mathematics knowledge; but if I don't organize the progress I know will be more lost than today, believe me, I need to know what I'm doing and don't feel like that; have a lot of hope to be helped with yours indications, perhaps with ways to analyze my game and work on it, or just your workstyle out of the tables(need a lot of this kind info for take better decisions).
Then, I include here my PokerStars NL2 SH graph and stats since I started playing "seriously" (66k+ hands). Changed my game and style of play between first session till last but not too much, and I still haven't clearly know if I was playing better in some spots and vs. some rival styles at the start but I feel it sometimes; because of that I added a lot of data with the intention of improve my play analyzing it but it makes me crazy sometimes because don't understand well from where is coming my winnings and if I'm doing it good or not... can you see that I'm lost atm even as winner, it's so easy at this stake...
(excuse me for this badly written bible, AND READ IT if you think can help me please)
GRAPH
-> Gyazo graph link <-
STATS (this is in some pieces, I added a lot of data for analyze it like I said before; and didn't simplify this for the post just because I think could be useful for you can help me, hope so)
Part 1
-> Gyazo stats link 1 <-
Part 2
-> Gyazo stats link 2 <-
Part 3...
-> Gyazo stats link 3 <-
Part 4.......
-> Gyazo stats link 4 <-
Part 5................ the last
-> Gyazo stats link 5 <-
THANKS FOR ALL PEOPLE WHO HELP THE PEOPLE!!
(even just reading)
PD: did it by links because couldn't see the images working in post preview, like one of the first posters; how it's done??
Hey, sorry nobody wrote back.
I'll go through as many stats as I can.
UO Pfr% looks very good. Obviously the SB% is very high. but if you're getting away with it at these limits then keep it up.
CC%. This should be higher on the button. You shouldn't really have just a set range that you call in position. I.E 22-JJ , AJ, AQ . MP vs EP We might not be able to flat all of these profitably. Whereas BTN vs Co we can call stuff like T9s, 98s.
3betting : SB should be higher than BB. You shouldn't have much of a flatting range in the SB. Vs EP and MP is it ok to have a pretty strong flatting range here. 88-QQ , AJ, AQ, but vs CO and BTN, its almost always better to 3bet. We aren't really getting a great price to call, with only half a big blind invested, and we open ourselves to getting squeezes from the BB, or playing a multiway pot out of position.
Regarding 3betting in position, your 3bet% should depend on what hands you are happy to get it in with. For example. MP vs EP, we are probably only happy to get it in with KK and AA (0.9% of hands). so we can balance this with around 1.5% bluffs. We can obviously 3bet more than this and get away with it at NL2, but this is just a balanced approach.
BTN vs CO we should be quite happy to get it in with at least QQ+, AK , if not JJ, AQs etc. Which means we can 3bet around 7.5% here, including bluffs.
^^ It should be noted that this is more balanced approach, and if guys at your limits dont 4bet bluff enough, dont stack off light enough, stack off way too light etc, then obviously keep doing what you think is best.
4bet range should be highest on the button. When you get 3bet from the blinds, you should be 4betting, and then be happy to call a shove, when you have QQ+,AK (~2.6% of hands). A lot of people 4bet call JJ too, but at these limits i dont think guys will 5bet shove back wide enough to justify it.
Also vs guys that 3bet way too much, you should have a 4bet bluff range. Stuff like A2s-A5s works well.
You're calling way too many 4bets. This probably suggests that
1. You're 3betting a merged range, and not a polarized range
2. You over value the implied odds you get when calling.
1: Typically, when you 3bet a hand (specifically when in position) you should be doing it for value or as a bluff. You shouldn't 3bet a hand like TT or AJ, BTN vs MP and then be uncomfortable facing a 4bet. These hands are profitable enough to cold call. It makes more sense to flat these, and 3bet a hand that is not good enough to call, but can play well in a 3bet pot, and can also fold vs a 4bet. Lets say, for example QTs.
2. Calling 4bets is rarely correct, unless your opponent makes it a tiny size, or else you are trapping with a monster. vs guys that 4bet too wide, you can shove a lot of your range back (JJ+, AK should be a definite shove most of the time). And against guys that don't 4bet that much, just fold most of your hands. give them credit.
Sqz a bit more from the blinds, mainly from the BB. Standard spot, CO opens, btn calls, you can 3bet quite wide from both positions here. Or maybe btn opens, sb flats. You should squeeze a lot wider.
WWSF is quite low from the BB. Since its NL2 , I imagine there are a lot of limped pots. And im sure when you play a lot of tables , a lot of the time you will be seeing a flop with a hand like 83o, and just be hitting the "check/fold btn". You should try take down these pots occasionally, especially if the flop checks around.
Check fold flop as pfr% is too high, but youre almost certainly not being exploited by this. There are still some spots where you could introduce a check calling range that might lead to higher EV.
EG. you raise the sb with A2o. Flop comes A T 4 r. A bet might make him fold everything worse than your hand, so check calling at least allows him to make a mistake.
It also "protects your checking range",but this isnt really that important at NL2.
Your stats are very good , and I imagine you have less leaks than most NL2 players.
I would suggest moving up limits. You're beating NL2 for 10bb/100. Obviously there are guys that can beat it for a lot more than this, but you will improve a lot quicker playing NL5, than you will staying at NL2 trying to "reach 15 bb/100 ".
Goodluck
Last edited by garyk5846; 12-12-2014 at 07:27 AM.