No reads and its zoom. Doesnt really know what to do here readless. Feels nitty to lay it down IMO and calling an UTG 3bet I also feels unsure of.

You 3-bet, UTG 4-bets.

Just call the first raise. Now fold. AQs oop is meh vs UTG raising range and crushed by UTGs 4-bet range.

Would also just flat, squeezing turns it into a bluff.
Unless you know BTN is a fish or Utg is a fish

playe it fine now fold, AQ is not gonna be good enuf here when you get it in

obv fold

Fold, your 3bet is fine though.

If we were deeper I'd be tempted to flat this as it's so small.

Without fishs flat pf is better than squeeze. As played, easy fold against utg std range.

ok so I can now see the fold to his 4bet is the correct thing to do. The 3bet or flat question is now what I find it interesting cause I though 3bet here was best.

My thinking is that AQs is to good of a hand to let it go and play OOP multiway(much rather just playing it HU OOP), UTG range is often pretty strong but then we have a really wide button range(I can see a flat much more without the BTN call). By 3betting I can surely fold to a 4bet from UTG and still doing pretty good vs just a call. It also gives me a greater chance of playing it headsup. Doesnt see that I cant make a value 3bet here with holdings such as AQ and JJ(I often gets one or both to call with a pretty wide range) and often if UTG is calling then BTN is calling like 99% of his range that he called with before. Dont know if my thinking is totally wrong if I say I much rather play OOP with a pretty good hand headsup instead of multiway.

I don't agree with 3b here readless. If we have a read that UTG or BTN is a fish then 3b to iso the fish is a good plan.