I played this hand on Entraction NL10 yesterday, and I played it a little bit differently than I would normally do. Therefore I need a line check to see, if I can go down the same path another time, or if you should completely keep myself away.

I don't mind checking back the flop as it prevents you from having to give up equity when raised by an ace or better. But why raise the turn? You fold out most everything you're crushing and maybe get called by a few worse flushes, sets, and some aces with a good heart redraw. If you have a read that the bettor will stack off light then this is fine, otherwise you are losing value.

i would bet the flop, just because we have no SD value and can get PP to fold by our 2nd barrel on the turn.

as played never folding this hand

Just bet the flop yourself, you have good equity and as PeoplesElbow said you can barrel many turns to fold out pocket pairs.

As played I might call turn but seeing as there's not a lot of money in the pot from checking the flop I think raising is pretty good.

Flop is a definite cbet, we're IP and it's an Axx flop and we were the preflop aggressor- I think checking back this flop is a huge mistake. If the turn blanks, then another player could easily bet out forcing us to fold. There are a load of turn cards we can barrel and then obviously any heart brings us the 2nd nuts.

As played, you have to get it in on the turn, lots of worse flushes are playing this way. Unlucky that he happened to have what he had.

id cbet flop and fold turn
btw it is 3rd nutflush - 3h2h makes straight flush

Folding second nuts OTT is absolutely ridiculous (nobody has 32hh)

When we check flop and then raise turn our hand is pretty face up. I agree we shouldn't fold turn, but raising seems almost as bad. I dont even mind raising him all in on the river on most cards as villain is more priced in to call with worse flushes. But raising on the turn let's villain get away from worse as our hand is pretty clearly a flush. Once we raise and villain reraises the range is heavily skewed to nut flushes and maybe a j high flush or two. Given how we played the hand is villain really going to go nuts on the turn with an 8 or 9 high flush?

Yes.

It's not. We should cbet the flop and most people do.
The fact that we did check behind the flop as PFR makes it less likely that we had a FD and thus less likely that we hit a flush OTT.

I agree raising the turn when there is a potsize bet and a call looks very strong.
I don't know OP or the villains, but what our line looks like is JJ-KK with a heart.
Sure we often have a flush, but checking the turn makes it less likely, not more likely.

cbet flop, checking bad is really bad
as played be happy about turning a flush after checking back flop and get the money in

I really like this thought process. By checking flop, your giving up a chance to steal a very winning pot there later if you don't hit your flush.

getting away from second best hand can't be ridiculous
without reads im folding here

Oh yes it can and it is in most spots and specifically in this spot.
Absolutely ridiculous.

With some reads in some very specific spot (4 flush with second NF) you can do it. Against an unknown who definitely can get it in with any flush and possibly wider: it's insane.

may i ask, what makes you think this?