NL10: AQo 3bet Pot
06-22-2017
, 12:42 AM
Tell me what you think about all three streets:
1)Pre seems standard to me.
2) I felt since we had position calling was the best option on the flop.
3) What do you do on the turn?
Villain seems very taggish. I know he multi-tables and honestly didnt really notice him until this hand.
19/15/1.15AF 100 Hands
SB: $11.48 (114.8 bb)
BB: $11.82 (118.2 bb)
MP: $10.28 (102.8 bb)
CO: $13.41 (134.1 bb)
Hero (BTN): $24.84 (248.4 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with Q
A
MP folds, CO raises to $0.30, Hero raises to $0.90, SB calls $0.85, BB folds, CO calls $0.60
Flop: ($2.80) T 4 K (3 players)
SB checks, CO bets $1.50, Hero calls $1.50, SB folds
Turn: ($5.80) 5
(2 players)
CO bets $3.50, Hero ???
1)Pre seems standard to me.
2) I felt since we had position calling was the best option on the flop.
3) What do you do on the turn?
Villain seems very taggish. I know he multi-tables and honestly didnt really notice him until this hand.
19/15/1.15AF 100 Hands
SB: $11.48 (114.8 bb)
BB: $11.82 (118.2 bb)
MP: $10.28 (102.8 bb)
CO: $13.41 (134.1 bb)
Hero (BTN): $24.84 (248.4 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with Q
AMP folds, CO raises to $0.30, Hero raises to $0.90, SB calls $0.85, BB folds, CO calls $0.60
Flop: ($2.80) T
4 K (3 players)SB checks, CO bets $1.50, Hero calls $1.50, SB folds
Turn: ($5.80) 5
(2 players)CO bets $3.50, Hero ???
06-22-2017
, 12:56 AM
Why do you want to give away our positional advantage and narrow villains range by raising flop?
Against a nutty range of hands {sets, KTs, flushes} we have 24.2% equity and we need 27% to continue. That range is absurdly tight. Not to mention we'll get a stack when we hit a J or
some of the time. There's no way we should fold.
06-22-2017
, 09:39 AM
Quote:
Pre is completely standard.
Why do you want to give away our positional advantage and narrow villains range by raising flop?
Against a nutty range of hands {sets, KTs, flushes} we have 24.2% equity and we need 27% to continue. That range is absurdly tight. Not to mention we'll get a stack when we hit a J or some of the time. There's no way we should fold.
Why do you want to give away our positional advantage and narrow villains range by raising flop?
Against a nutty range of hands {sets, KTs, flushes} we have 24.2% equity and we need 27% to continue. That range is absurdly tight. Not to mention we'll get a stack when we hit a J or
some of the time. There's no way we should fold.
06-22-2017
, 02:40 PM
Quote:
Pre is completely standard.
Why do you want to give away our positional advantage and narrow villains range by raising flop?
Against a nutty range of hands {sets, KTs, flushes} we have 24.2% equity and we need 27% to continue. That range is absurdly tight. Not to mention we'll get a stack when we hit a J or some of the time. There's no way we should fold.
Why do you want to give away our positional advantage and narrow villains range by raising flop?
Against a nutty range of hands {sets, KTs, flushes} we have 24.2% equity and we need 27% to continue. That range is absurdly tight. Not to mention we'll get a stack when we hit a J or
some of the time. There's no way we should fold.
06-23-2017
, 08:16 PM
06-24-2017
, 05:11 AM
