I wasn't sure if I can discuss this here, but according to the uNL FAQ: "
uNL is a forum to discuss hand histories and theories that pertain to any stakes NL50 (0.25/0.50) and below." This would qualify as
theory relevant to beating NL50 and below IMO.
One of my friends asked me to do a leakfinder for him. I think I have a pretty good system in place for doing these atm and since I've been glued to HEM data for the last few weeks, I asked him to ship me some HH's for analysis. It didn't take long to realize he is gloriously overplaying hands.
They are pretty basic situations in which I'm sure 95% of you could give him good advice. Like this one, vs. a 15/12 villain over a few hundred hands.
Full Tilt Poker $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
2+2 Hand Converter
Powered By DeucesCracked
SB: $45.65
BB: $53.20
Hero (UTG): $50.00
MP: $50.00
CO: $50.00
BTN: $80.80
Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is UTG with Q

K
Hero raises to $1.50, MP calls $1.50,
1 fold, BTN calls $1.50,
2 folds
Flop: ($5.25) 3

K

6
(3 players)
Hero bets $3.50, MP calls $3.50, BTN calls $3.50
Turn: ($15.75) 2
(3 players)
Hero checks,
MP bets $9.25, BTN folds,
Hero raises to $45 all in, MP requests TIME, MP calls $35.75 all in
I won't bother you with counter HH's but that seems to be the general pattern. I told him about this and he said something to the effect of "I just often cannot believe that my TPGK or overpair got cracked again. I know these things but just got excited about playing 100nl then played like **** when that goal disappeared. Like people always say the only goal should be to play well and make correct decisions."
Ah yes. The issue that seems to keep most of us back from crushing. It's not that we don't
know the right answer to the hand if we get asked advice on it. It's that for some reason, some of us can't act on that knowledge.
The are other things we do as well which stunt our growth and our earnings. They have very little to do with strategy and an
enormous amount to do with psychology.
For example, I can't play long sessions, and often when I get up a few buy-ins, I quit. I am loss-averse, so when I'm up, I don't want to give much (any) of it back. My perfect session is winning little here, little there, and then going on a massive rush 45 minutes into the session and then quitting at the peak of my graph. For example, here is my graph for today:
48 minutes of play after which I had 0 motivation to continue. After that, the stress of putting in additional hands is really high. I can usually come back and play another session later on, but meh - don't really want to. I'm still very, very
result-oriented. My results effect my mood and I know this. If I end on a good note, I'm usually in a good mood for the rest of the day. The opposite holds as well. In the end, it's def costing me money though. Good luck telling me not to be results-oriented. It just doesn't work like that.
So what is the point of this post? As I was talking to my friend above, the conversation reminded me of this classic thread started by AZplaya called "
Expensive thoughts you have". For me, it's not that I have that many expensive thoughts (I mean ... I still do, but I think my overall tactical game is pretty solid as is my emotional control at the tables). I do have tons of expensive habits and routines AWAY from the tables.
I don't sleep well. I would make tons more money if I was well rested and could concentrate for more than 60 minutes at a time.
I hate losing and thus if I lose a few BI's and don't win them back by the end of the session, I'm in a bad mood for most of the rest of the day (or if I play an evening session I have a hard time going to sleep which leads back to issue # 1).
I spend waaaaay too much time browsing forums and the internet in general. If I spent half the time grinding that I spend on the forums, I would be as rich and ballin' as G2K4.
It seems like the cookie-cutter piece of advice people give to beginning micro stakes players is "play tight, don't bluff, and value bet thinly". I hear the same version of psychological advice and it's something like "don't worry about your results, eat well, and get plenty of exercise." ORLY? Is that really it? Wow ... I'm off to crush then.
I am willing to bet a lot of $$ that the things that separate to long-term winners from the long-term losers in this game won't have nearly that much to do with a deep understanding of poker strategy at the tables, but a deep understanding and overcoming of one's baggage away from the felt. Yet, it seems that people spend 90% of their effort trying to develop their ability to play 3-bet pots or stuff like that.
So I'm curious what you guys are aware of that holds you back from really making a lot of money. Is the main issue your poker game at the tables or is the main issue completely unrelated to the actual strategy involved in specific hands and something bigger?