[converted_hand][hand_history]Poker Stars, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #30112421

BTN: $3.72 (37.2 bb)
SB: $10.80 (108 bb) 23/19/11(3B) only around 55 hands, no specific reads
Hero (BB): $13.09 (130.9 bb)
UTG: $10.82 (108.2 bb)
MP: $13.72 (137.2 bb)
CO: $12.18 (121.8 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6 6
UTG folds, MP raises to $0.30, CO folds, BTN calls $0.30, SB calls $0.25, Hero calls $0.20

Flop: ($1.20) 6 3 9 (4 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, MP checks, BTN checks

Turn: ($1.20) 4 (4 players)
SB bets $0.90, Hero raises to $2.55, 2 folds, SB raises to $6.20, Hero raises to $12.79 and is all-in, SB calls $4.30 and is all-in

River: ($22.20) T (2 players, 2 are all-in)

Considered leading flop here but couldn't come up with a good enough argument for doing so at the time

Feel like we can discount 57s from his range, not impossible but I don't think he flats that from the sb. Ahead of basically all of his value here and wanted to charge his draws (while simultaneously potentially repping those same draws) which I felt like could be quite a large part of his range on this texture.

When I get 3B I guess there's not much to do but get the money in?

U got a set on a wet board vs bad players and its multiway. If no maniac is on table lead the flop 100% of the times

Ty, as played? Also - why wouldn't we lead if there was a maniac, not like we're ever folding to him here anyway, right?

Edit: Nvm, guess you mean let him bet for us.

if no one is folding here lead out
if no one is betting here lead out
c/r if someone will bet here, but as you see we can't
afford a card as the 4 comes off
You think he's raise/folding 57s from SB?
then he may have 2 pair gii OTT