Quote:
Originally Posted by ALongmuir
I'd 3B smaller by default, but if villains range is weaker so is less likely to defend it makes sense to bet smaller also. Don't think people are changing their 3B defending range depending on size too much.
I'd check flop, don't think betting is awful though. OTT none of our value hands really want to take this line, since we want to allow villain to continue bluffing with a fairly polarised range. By donking, we fold out all bluffs villain has and only getting called by their value since villain shouldn't expect us to have 4x in our range too often so imo it's bad. Don't see the issue with x/c, we have SDV and good equity vs villains range.
edit: saying that, we only really need 13% fold equity here so I guess it's fine
If I had a stronger hand I may 3bet 1bb smaller. You're probably right that they call the same frequency. But the benefit is it creates more dead money when they fold to a flop cbet which I will fire nearly all of the time in this spot.
Not taking this line with our value hands is the main consideration I had when reviewing the hand. It's a reasonable case against the shove. However we are most likely behind on the turn but shoving may get him to fold hands like 6x 99-77. It puts him in a tough spot with marginal hands that we're behind to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSurprises
I don't mind the cb. You've created the dead money that you now want to take down. You have some decent suck out equity if called. When villain raises the flop I would just check turn and decide.
The problem I have with checking the turn is if he shoves, which he should given his SPR, I probably don't have the price to call. I assume I'm behind on the turn but villain has enough hands that will have a hard time calling a shove. Even when he does with sets or a straight I have a decent number of outs.
IDK though, maybe it's too polarized towards bluffs.