Quote:
Originally Posted by XxGodJrxX
Is that good or bad?
|
it's extremely good. 2k in meds is usually like 1 doctor's visit. Slip and falls are super hard b/c you have to be a dumbass to slip and fall usually, and you have to prove that the defendant knew or should have known of the condition, or did something negligent to cause the condition. Here, we alleged they mopped, but they had a good denial. If I were the defense, I would have said "yeah we mopped, big fing deal, we are supposed to mop. "
Then, your client looks like an ******* when he asks for some ridiculous amount of money and juries hate people like that usually. Very interesting case...the defense lawyer was good at what he was doing (i.e. witness examination/cross/open/close), but did a pretty poor job in my opinion on his overall defense.
I was trying to watch as neutral as possible and their side just came off like the bad guy when they didn't have to be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hey_Porter
That's absolute crazy talk. 200k is crazy talk. What jurisdiction are you in? Slip and fall soft tissue (which I assume it is for 2k in meds) here in Oregon without crazy, crazy facts might get you 10k NE, if you're lucky. Oregon juries are drinking the tort reform kool aid.
|
Probably worse forum: Texas. Verdict was technically 27k too so even better. Don't know if anyone else around the country is familiar with "paid or incurred", but it absolutely screws us. The guy had 7-8k in meds but we can only show 2k to the jury b/c of insurance. Our guy was advised to explain his ridiculous demand in a really smart way though: "I'd pay $50 per day since this happened for this pain to go away." Adds up.