Quote:
Originally Posted by DayTripping
If the release of all of these schedules proves one thing it is that poker players will always find something to complain about.
Everything one (or any provider) do(es) is always going to please some and displease others. If the majority are happy, then you've done reasonably well, and that's how you judge. In this case, I don't believe the majority are pleased.
For me personally, my journey to Vegas takes 18 - 20 hours from Australia. I book it in January to ensure reasonable flight prices, as to wait for all the schedules to be released, and then try and book something is peak season will cost me 3x as much.
So when a schedule is promised, and then delayed 3 times, and then when it eventually comes out, it esentially has a daily $30k Guarantee $300 event for almost every day that I'm there, I'll put up my hand and say I'm disappointed. It's basically just another normal daily tournament (with a slightly higher buy-in). Factor in that the Rio will run daily tourneys that will cost less to enter, and generate a prize pool 6 - 8 times greater.
And before you go all "Rio is a crapshoot" on me, the bottom line is that a one day tournament is a one day tournament, there's always an element of crapshoot. It might be slightly more variable at the Rio to get through the numbers, but that's a chance many are happy to take.
If I look at all the schedules released so far (imho):
WSOP - great schedule
GN - great schedule (I won't play much, but it's a great schedule)
DSE - I don't think this works as it doesn't gel with WSOP
Binions - Largely neutral, but think timing of Champ Event is smart
Wynn - Disappointing, as it's basically a 4-event schedule with some slightly higher buy-in dailies