Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBizzle
This is all imho and probably colored by a few experiences I've had at both places, someone like Mascot could probably give a more comprehensive view of the two places. In general, the floors at Seneca are nicer but probably a bit less competent, their tournaments definitely have a few oddities when they're ran. The dealer quality is very similar amongst the two places, as is the quality of the room, drink servers, etc. Fields at Seneca are usually a bit smaller than a comparable tournament at Turning Stone, although I've never been 100% sure why.
I agree with this for the most part.
Lately, I've noticed that the floor staff at turning stone has gone down hill and they're starting to get worse and worse each series.
As said, dealers are all about the same. I think Seneca has more out going dealers though.
Tournament wise, this schedule is withered. Seneca I believe is on the up and up with their room. I think 90% of the problem for the low turn outs at Seneca are due to the 30% tax withholding to Canadians. Once they get rid of this (and they're apparently working on it), I wouldn't be surprised to see their main events get 300+ people.
The thing about Seneca that I like so much is that Amanda and jay are both very open to changing to what the players want. (Look at the starting flights and guarantees). The structures are about the same- both skip levels but are not bad at all.