Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Eight
I played many Goliath events last summer and yes, everything wasn't perfect BUT the festival was a huge success overall.
In fact, too much of a success probably: the Ultimate Goliath 600$, one of the best events under 1000$ this year, had more than 2000 runners! I don't think the crew expected that so they made a few mistakes, but it was far from a disaster.
Another example: Goliath had a Dealer's Choice event with 21 poker variants for only 130$!
I played it and we had minor issues (dealers calling the floor about some rules for rare games, etc...) but I think almost every player had a blast. Where in Vegas do you have small stakes Dealer's Choice?
Of course there is room for improvement but I'm happy to see another Goliath festival coming. And I hope they'll keep offering tournaments you don't find elsewhere.
A disaster... no, but they seem to keep making the same mistakes over and over. They've been running the summer series for two years now. Hopefully next summer they will have learned from their mistakes.
Two recommendations for Chris:
1) When the WSOP schedule comes out (hopefully no later than late Jan.), take a couple weeks to develop yours. Post a preliminary schedule here or Twitter or wherever you like. I know you prefer to get player feedback. Make sure the schedule you post is clearly marked as PRELIMINARY. Accept whatever constructive feedback and whining you like and create your FINAL schedule (hopefully by early March) so players can plan their extensive travel. Plan for success in the marquee events so that even minor adjustments don't become necessary. DON'T CHANGE YOUR SCHEDULE.
2) An issue which was discussed at length in another thread was your early registration policy, vis-à-vis players who don't show up at the start of the tourney. One group of players shows up late after registering early. Another group of players shows up late and registers day-of. The first group of players are penalized by blinding them off. The second group is not. I don't understand why you have this discrepancy, especially since it dis-incentivizes early registration (something that is good for you). Ideally, you could correct this by giving late-arrivers a full stack regardless of when they registered (this seems like the easiest remedy logistically). Or you could just make it so late-arrivers are treated the same. Either way, it would be better than the current policy, which penalizes early registration.