Quote:
Originally Posted by wildman75
round for round is beyond stupid..just makes people stall more. please change that before the main.
I wasn't there, and don't know how they used the round-for-round concept, but how would it cause people to stall more? The few times I've seen r-f-r it was much better than hand-for-hand.
The way I've seen r-f-r used was they played a specific number of hands, and everybody who busted during that entire round at any table was considered to be tied with everybody else who busted during that round. If this was the way DP did it, then why would anybody want to stall? You're going to play "x" number of hands at your table, so who cares how fast or slow they play out? The only thing I can imagine is if somebody wants to fake-tank the first hand at their table, let every other table play all of their hands, and then see how many have busted out. Is something like that what happened?
Personally, I much prefer r-f-r based on the few times I've done it, and I've often encouraged TDs to add it to their events. It was always faster than h-f-h likely would've been.
Thanks, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)