Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Analyzing Books: for writers Analyzing Books: for writers

10-09-2009 , 03:41 PM
In Notes From a Small Country Bryson starts

Quote:
There are certain idiosyncratic notions that you quietly come to accept when you live for a long time in Britain. One is that British summers used to be longer and sunnier. Another is that the England soccer team shouldn't have any trouble with Norway. A third is the idea that Britain is a big place. This last is easily the most intractable.

If you mention in a pub that you intend to drive from, say, Surrey to Cornwall, a distance most Americans would happily go to get a taco...
He immediately introduces his subject here. We know what the book is about and what it will be like. There is no conflict, there will be no character change. I noticed that Bryson's books flow very easily but at the same time, especially as a reporter of what happens not not a novelist, he takes what is funny and strings it together. Those transition sentences help a lot like here "This last is easily the most intractable." It doesn't really matter if it's the lst intractable or not, it's just something he needs to put in there so it flows, and it is easy to get lost as the reader in good stories even if they shouldn't flow together.

It's also interesting he doesn't start out IN TIME here. This isn't, "one time i said this," he says, "IF YOU MENTION"... this will happen, and IMO these are quite distinct choices.

Then four pages later he says "astounded to realize that i was closer to Cherbourg than i was to London... All this is a roundabout way of explaining how it was that I came to be standing... at Calais... I had come to Calais because I was about to embark on a grand tour of Britain and wanted to reenter the country as I had first seen it..."

IMO here he introduces his book and then has it flow into his story just by putting that silly transition sentence in there but it works. It's interesting he has his long introduction that isn't part of the story, then five pages in gets in time in the story and sneaks in his explination for why he is doing this cause it is not important to his book so it's just one paragraph five pages in.

Then, "I murmured and immediately fell into one of those reveries that are traditionally depicted on television by bringing up the music and making the screen go wavy. I was remembering my first sight of England more than twenty years before..."

Again a simple transition sentence to link stuff that really has no business being linked together. The next ten pages is all the story of him in England twenty years ago and it shows England more. Then the first chapter ends and he goes into the second chapter and picks up the story in time, in the current, and goes with it from there.
Analyzing Books: for writers Quote
10-09-2009 , 03:53 PM
I don't have the book in front of me but I love A Walk in the Woods and think it is a true masterpiece and something to learn from. He started that book out with "Not long after I moved with my family to a small town in New Hampshire I happened upon a path that vanished into a wood on the edge of town."

This is different from the first book and IMO works btter. He starts off right in the story. Then the second paragraph he mentions how many miles long it is, where it goes, the names of different mountain ranges. That was stuff he COULDNT know first person, in time in the story. IMO this is also one of the hardest lines he has to walk in the book. He switches back and forth between being this character discovering the trail and its difficulties and between being an omnisprecent narrator. Some of the times he introduces the stuff through the story like, "well i got some books like this book on bears... Take it from me, if you are without weapons and a Grizzly charges you, run." But some of the time he is just the omnisprsent narrator and he gets quite technical and goes into a lot of detail about various subjects.

I am somewhat at a lose to explain how he makes his story flow so well given this fact. I think it is a couple of reasons though. Even when he is delving into subjects with all sorts of facts, he still keeps the same narrator tone of being dry and witty so the changes aren't so jarring. Another thing is how he structures it. There are about 25 chapters at 15 pages long is I remember correctly. He generally starts a chapter off with 5 page aside on some matter like the National Park Service building roads, or about violence on the AT, and then he continues his story and has a little mini story that raps itself up by the end of the chapter. So in the next chapter when he starts a new aside he isn't breaking the flow of the story so much since he just closed a mini story off.

I wish I had this book in front of me now!
Analyzing Books: for writers Quote
10-09-2009 , 04:00 PM
Everyone thinks Summer used to be sunnier, British people do not think that Britain is a big place and, just as a plain old-fashioned matter of fact, almost all Americans would not happily drive the distance from Surrey to Cornwall to get a taco.
Analyzing Books: for writers Quote

      
m