Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
pointless knowledge pointless knowledge

03-26-2009 , 06:06 PM
Maybe "Frankenword" would have been a better choice on my part in place of fabricated since "conundrum" was stitched together from the body parts of a dead language?
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merek007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wave Length
Pointless knowledge: Polar Bears live at the north pole and
Penguins at the south pole.
Actually wrong ....Polar Bears live in the North and closer to the pole than most of us but not close. Hundreds of miles away. The Bears need open ice to hunt for seals and there is none at the pole.

Penguins live in the south but not within 100s of miles of the south pole. Only two species live in Antartica and most species live in other places such as S. America, Georgia Island...etc.
I'd like to nominate merek for the Nit O' The Day Award.

Speaking of Encyclopedia Brown, I remember another story that hinged on seeing penguins in a museum display depicting the North Pole; that discrepancy was a clue for Encyclopedia.

Extremely Useless fact that Encyclopedia Brownophiles will appreciate-
I used to play in a band called Bugs Meany.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max H
This was a good one. I remember that MLB was promoting the hell out of the upcoming 1 millionth run and that scoreboards throughout the league would keep a running tally as the number drew closer.
Yeah, and that was pre-internet and -ESPN. Run number 1,000,001 was scored by Dave Concepcion a few seconds later.

Quote:
Dave McNally of the Baltimore Orioles was the only pitcher to ever hit a grand slam in a World Series game (1970 Game 3). The only reason this sticks out in my mind is that I was in attendance.
That's cool. Two of the best teams of the era, too. The losing pitcher in that game was Tony Cloninger, the only pitcher to hit two grand slams in one game, which he did when he pitched for the Braves a few years earlier.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 07:02 PM
altough german soldiers during WWII weren't allowed to have sexual encounters with soviet civilians, every soldier was equipped with packet of Vulkan Sanex condoms.

"The English word 'turncoat' apparently originated in a ruse de guerre whereby soldiers were issued with uniforms that are their own country's on the inside and the enemy's uniform on the outside. The purpose was deception in order to get within the point blank range area of the enemy, suddenly opening fire. The expression "turn coat" comes from the act of physically turning the uniform inside out."
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 07:47 PM
elephants are the only animals that cannot jump
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prfsr_cain
elephants are the only animals that cannot jump
Really? I don't think snakes can jump, or fish, or snails.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 08:06 PM
the brightest star in the sky (other than the sun) is called Sirius...but its actuallly a binary system (two stars in orbit around each other)
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 08:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonfan
Really? I don't think snakes can jump, or fish, or snails.
I think he meant "mammals".

A good southern boy like ya'self oughtta know fish can jump. They remain, however, miserable pole vaulters.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 08:11 PM
Whales are mammals. I guess it would work if he said land mammals, but that's specific enough that it's no longer an interesting statistic.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonfan
Whales are mammals. I guess it would work if he said land mammals, but that's specific enough that it's no longer an interesting statistic.
Landon. Buddy. Whales can jump.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 08:53 PM
BUT CAN THEY WIN A OLYMPICS GOLD MEDAL LIKE THE DREAMBOAT SHAWN ^SWOON^
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kudzudemon
Landon. Buddy. Whales can jump.
Idk if you're joking or not. If you're trying to tell me that breaching = jumping, then I'm gonna have to disagree unless you can prove to me that it's scientifically classified as jumping.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 09:19 PM
ginger and kudz..stop it wheres teh get a room trading card?

lf, less time being a nit and more time turning your head from side to side so you can remember interesting universe stuff...
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 09:23 PM
In Buck vs. Bell (1927), the US Supreme Court held that compulsory sterlization of mentally ******ed adults was permissible.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kudzudemon
Landon. Buddy. Whales can jump.
Not Moby Dick, though. Everyone knows white whales can't jump.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by caretaker1
In Buck vs. Bell (1927), the US Supreme Court held that compulsory sterlization of mentally ******ed adults was permissible.
From the same reliable folks who brought you the Dred Scott Decision and Roe v Wade. They also, in their infinite, lawyer class wisdom, ruled that Scientology is indeed, a USA-certified religion.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 10:49 PM
How about this for pointless knowledge . . . An infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of keyboards will never ever reproduce the works of Shakespeare over an infinite amount of time.

I think the above is factual and proven by mathematical probability geeks but I could be wrong.

If factual, I don't really see a point in knowing or proving it to be, and the idea of an infinite number of monkeys pressing buttons . . . gaaa, head asplode.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-26-2009 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonfan
Idk if you're joking or not. If you're trying to tell me that breaching = jumping, then I'm gonna have to disagree unless you can prove to me that it's scientifically classified as jumping.
:: sigh :::

Okay.

This from Enchanted Learning's Whale Glossary-

Quote:
Breaching: Many whales are very acrobatic, even breaching (jumping) high out of the water and then slapping the water as they come back down.
Really, if you can't accept the learning of the enchanted, I feel for you. They're enchanted, for Pete's sake..

Or this Wikipedia page, with the definition provided by cetacean researcher and whale groupie Hal Whitehead, in which he defines a breach as a "leap". In fact, virtually everything I checked defined a "breach" as a jump or a leap.

As to a "scientific classification" of jumping, there is none; different species do it in different ways. Frogs and horses both jump, but are not physiologically identical in doing so. But even if you accept the rigorous definition that demands the jumper has to be at some point 100% airborne after propelling oneself up, using one's own power, then whales can, indeed, jump.

Now, as to whether other mammals can or cannot jump: there is no real consensus. Even the guy at AllExperts, who seems to have zoological degrees spewing out of his wazoo, cannot give a definite answer, although he seems to doubt the jumping abilities of sloths and bats. Also unable to jump, at least according to Wesley Snipes? White men. This in spite of the House of Pain imploring us to do so.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kudzudemon
As to a "scientific classification" of jumping, there is none
So then jumping is subjective. In that case, I refuse to believe that it's possible to jump without the involvement of legs of some sort.

Also, showing a bunch of articles where breaching is described as jumping doesn't mean it is jumping. It's just being compared to jumping because that's the best way to explain it.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 12:23 AM
How do you prove a negative?
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonfan
So then jumping is subjective. In that case, I refuse to believe that it's possible to jump without the involvement of legs of some sort.
Awaiting your explanation as to why Mexican Breaching Beans have never broken through as a novelty item.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonfan
Also, showing a bunch of articles where breaching is described as jumping doesn't mean it is jumping. It's just being compared to jumping because that's the best way to explain it.
Only here in the South, where five constitutes a full set of teeth, would two be considered a "bunch".

The fact that there is no consensus in a physiological or scientific definition of "jump" does not mean it is purely subjective. In the examples cited, breaching is not being compared to jumping, it is being identified as jumping. If you want to google up, you'll find plenty of qualified folks who consider it "jumping" without giving one thought to whether it passes your definitional muster.

If you want to continue to use such a semantic loophole, be my guest. It's unassailable, really.

You can also put on a Burger King crown, walk around town in your bathrobe, and call yourself the King of Landonfanland. Just don't expect a whole lotta bowing and scraping going on when you walk by.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 01:25 AM
blah blah blah, can't jump without legs, end of story. Whales are just flailing around in the water until both a whaleologist and a jumpologist tell me otherwise.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 01:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonfan
blah blah blah, can't jump without legs, end of story. Whales are just flailing around in the water until both a whaleologist and a jumpologist tell me otherwise.
A whaleologist did tell you. See my first response. If you read that article, he further explains the difference between a breach and a lurch, and describes the physical activity needed to achieve such feats. None are achieved by simply "flailing around".

As for a jumpologist, I am awaiting a call back from Doctors Roth and Van Halen.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 01:37 AM
Landonfan and kudzudemon...I think that this is really what you want from each other...



You ain't foolin' me with all these talk about "whales"...

Last edited by HobbyHorse; 03-27-2009 at 01:40 AM. Reason: So "breaching" is the new code word, huh? Who knew...
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 01:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kudzudemon
A whaleologist did tell you. See my first response. If you read that article, he further explains the difference between a breach and a lurch, and describes the physical activity needed to achieve such feats. None are achieved by simply "flailing around".
Did he describe the part where the whale bends its knees and pushes off from the ground? Cause otherwise it's not jumping.
pointless knowledge Quote
03-27-2009 , 01:47 AM
HH,

How about I breach your face?
pointless knowledge Quote

      
m