Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Movies: Talk About What You've Seen Lately--Part 3 Movies: Talk About What You've Seen Lately--Part 3

01-20-2014 , 10:08 PM
Rewatching The Beach. I've always considered myself an Alex Garland fan. I love The Beach book and film and looooooooove Sunshine. But now looking him up I find out that he also wrote the screenplay adaptation for Never Let Me Go and the screenplay for Dredd? Power rating increased. Clap clap.
01-21-2014 , 01:43 AM
Her I can't quite gush over it like many others have done, but it was very good and maybe the movie I've liked the most from 2013.

Spoiler:
I don't mean this criticism as "this part of the movie sucks", just "this part of the movie is not awesome." This is cliche: guy had a relationship and gets rejected and is heartbroken but the dude really rejected the woman because he wouldn't open himself up to her and share his true feelings and self. You could say, "well, that is great because it's true to life." I don't really think so. I think that's more of a woman's fantasy or maybe just what men think a woman's fantasy is. In general that is. Not always. But it's still a cliche. Or maybe it is a man's fantasy. Like, when you lose a game but have the excuse that you weren't trying that hard.

To me, truer to life is someone to come to that realization and then have someone say, "That's pathetic. You didn't blather on about every little feeling you had to each other because unless you're 16 years old, falling down drunk, or living in romance novel, that's not the way adults act." I guess Amy Adams almost went there, saying that the ex was volatile, but the message of the film remains the romance novel version of love.

That said, looked great, great performances, amazingly managed the "sex" scenes without it being ridiculous, setting and premise were very interesting thoughts about the near future and commentary on today's use of tech and social media.

p.s. Alan Watts is a goofball and a goofball magnet. That irked me a little. (I usually use goofball as a sort of a compliment, but not in this case.)


8.5/10

Last edited by microbet; 01-21-2014 at 01:55 AM.
01-21-2014 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ra_Z_Boy
What did I just watch?
01-21-2014 , 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
Both of you should start a Letterboxed account. great for film lists/blogs
Thanks for suggesting this Dom, it's a great site. I'm all over it like a rash. Just needs a dedicated mobile app now to really fly.
01-21-2014 , 07:26 PM
Inside Llewyn Davis is filled with these wonderful little moments, rhythms of speech, elliptical narrative moments, and a hero who can't win - in other words, it is a Coen Bros movie. I happen to love their style, and you can guess what I thought of this one. It's very funny, also surprisingly endearing. 9/10
01-21-2014 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
Miniseries first. It has all the setup. "33 minutes" is a little intense to start someone on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianlippert
If she can't get through the miniseries how do you expect her to get through season 2? I think mini series first as it's more representative of the series as a whole. Also doesnt it setup the whole baltar-cylon connection? Seems like thing might be a bit confusing if she doesn't see that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB91
100% go with the miniseries. If she hates it consider getting a new one, imo.

More seriously though I'm not sure why you preferred it as I found the story very confusing until I learned that there was a miniseries because they continually reference it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRANTZ
FOR THE LOVE OF BALTAR START BSG WITH THE MINISERIES IT SETS UP THE ENTIRE STORY AND IS ****ING BADASS!!!
TY for pointing me in the right direction. Started with the mini series, and it was amazing. First hour was really slow and kind of boring, but the next 2 hours were unreal good.

I watched all 4 seasons and loved it, but had never seen the MS. The attack on the colonies was totally different than I had imagined all the time I had watched it. I had pictured something sudden, a huge bang, a bunch of nukes, panic, lots of fighting, and then the fleet fleeing in despair. But the actual version was way better... nukes slowly going off 1 by 1, people scattered, mass amounts of confusion, information trickling in, ships slowly being destroyed... just super intense and dramatic, I think I had goosebumps for 2 hours.

She was obv hooked, and we immediately watched the next two episodes, and then two more then next day.

::thumbsup::
01-21-2014 , 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abysmal
Just watched Filth which I'd heard good things about but hadn't got round to seeing. I'm going to give it an 8/10. McAvoy was super strong playing a 30 something douche which I didn't see him being good at and the rest of the cast was solid. Definitely deserved more attention than it got.
Thanks for giving it more attention. Liked it a lot.
01-21-2014 , 09:10 PM
Is it bad I've never watched Taxi Driver? Was going to watch it for the first time tonight.

Actually went through all of Martin Socrese's films and I'm going to watch everyone that I've missed, as I cannot remember a poor film he directed.
01-21-2014 , 11:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by therightdeal
Is it bad I've never watched Taxi Driver?
No, how can it be 'bad' not to have seen a movie?

It's a great movie and you should watch it though!

As a companion piece I recommend I Stand Alone. It riffs on similar themes while being imo far more disturbing. Taxi Driver juuuust a little bit lacks some of the punch that was intended given how ingrained it became in our cinema; although it certainly still has an impact. Then go to the theater and watch his masterpiece if you haven't yet ldo.
01-21-2014 , 11:49 PM
Her is a very rich movie in terms of ideas and philosophy. You could sit around and discuss it endlessly. The only problem I have is that it tends to drift into navel gazing territory here and there - on purpose? I can't tell. And for whatever reason it keeps using characters to blurt out thematic talking points just in case someone didn't get it as if it doesn't trust the audience to work it all out themselves. In other news I absolutely love how Samatha evolves throughout the movie. I felt like they got all of that right and only wished they'd done the same with the human characters. So I dunno, I liked it more than not, but I certainly didn't connect with it anywhere near the level a lot of people did. 7/10
01-22-2014 , 12:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by clydetheglide
This was some really well thought-out stuff. I definitely find myself guilty of criticizing movies for things that I don't like, rather than analyzing whether or not something's good. I guess that's why I couldn't ever be a movie critic, bc I have a hard time looking at something objectively...because there are things that I just don't like watching, whether it be more real or not.

I liked your point on smugness/brutal honesty. It's sometimes hard for ppl to "inform" others of something that they think they know without sounding smug or condescending about it. On top of that, they are always more smug about the delivery when they themselves are unsure of the validity of what it is they are trying to prove. Let alone when they are using it to prop up their own self-worth; "look at what I know" etc. I think most ppl have been guilty of this kind of stuff, particularly in their 20's, and it's hard to fault his character for that, and even if his delivery is bad, so are a lot of people's. Again, it seems more like a criticism of the character's personality than it is of the movie itself.

I enjoyed reading the discourse in this thread on the trilogy, and I randomly came across this link today, thought I'd share

http://www.grantland.com/blog/hollyw...efore-midnight
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycosid
I think you're being a little too hard on Jesse here. Yea, he's an ******* at a lot of points in this movie, with the atheist story being the nadir. But its all a front. At heart, he's the optimist of the pair, the one who reads 'All You Need is Love' and sees his grandmother in the rainbow and envisions himself as a 13 year old boy. Remember, he's in Europe to see his (now ex-)girlfriend. He saved up all his money hoping for a life-affirming event (just like the old lady from the fortune teller story), only to come over and visit this girl he thought he loved and find out she is now utterly disinterested in him. So when he meets Celine, he's clearly enamored, and is actually the one who suggests this whole fantastic sojourn, but at the same time is trying to repress his own romantic personality to preemptively stop himself from being hurt again so soon. When he's on the fake phonecall, he talks about being afraid of sounding stupid in front of Celine. So, in an attempt to both to protect himself from harm and to throw up a cool personality in front of this intimidating woman, he throws up this wall of cynicism, trying his best to see the world in the most negative light possible, even as his natural romanticism comes pouring through.
I was out of town for a long time, but wanted to acknowledge the insight of both these replies. Heavy agreement with both of them.

I re-watched Reality Bites before posting this, and may have been influenced by Hawke's character in that (and also by the memory of Siskel and Ebert's reaction to that film) when I wrote this. I have many positive feelings for Jesse, in varying degrees of fondness, empathy, enjoyment, and probably even jealousy. I definitely root for him in all three movies, maybe even in "Sunrise" the most, I just don't think he's supposed to be the Gen-X version of Tom Hank in Sleepless in Seattle in that movie.

Maybe Billy Crystal in When Harry Met Sally, though.
01-22-2014 , 12:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
Her is a very rich movie in terms of ideas and philosophy. You could sit around and discuss it endlessly. The only problem I have is that it tends to drift into navel gazing territory here and there - on purpose? I can't tell. And for whatever reason it keeps using characters to blurt out thematic talking points just in case someone didn't get it as if it doesn't trust the audience to work it all out themselves. In other news I absolutely love how Samatha evolves throughout the movie. I felt like they got all of that right and only wished they'd done the same with the human characters. So I dunno, I liked it more than not, but I certainly didn't connect with it anywhere near the level a lot of people did. 7/10
I think you're being too narrow here. You could remove the technology aspect completely, and it would still be one of the most thoughtful and emotional "divorce" movies of all time.

And this :

Quote:
You could sit around and discuss it endlessly.
is enough to push above a 7 imo. It's got a lot to ponder about what defines humanity (I actually wished he had pushed that angle just a couple degrees further, but you can tell he wants us to do it on our own).

Btw vix, I agree WOWS belongs firmly in the realm of Goodfellas and Casino. It's awesome.
01-22-2014 , 12:46 AM
Well, I mean, you could make an extraordinarily bad movie that is filled with rich philosophical ideas worth exploring in other mediums. I don't think there is any connection to how much you can discuss a movie and the merit it has as a movie itself. A movie isn't a jumping off point for discussion. It is a self contained experience.

Last edited by vixticator; 01-22-2014 at 12:59 AM. Reason: speaking in general here, not about this specific movie
01-22-2014 , 01:07 AM
Here's what I liked most, I think it supported by the text... spoilers:

Spoiler:
That she dumped him.

I think Samantha desires initially to be human due to her, erm, programming, and "falling in love" was part of her quest to do just that. She wants a physical body, she is jealous of humans. Eventually she moves beyond the whims of her creators (humans) and falls out of love as soon as she becomes content with her 'being'. She proceeds to play along for his sake for quite a long time, I believe she was "over" him (in a way) a long time before she admits it. But she cares for him in a way.

Last edited by vixticator; 01-22-2014 at 01:19 AM.
01-22-2014 , 02:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
A movie isn't a jumping off point for discussion.
It certainly can be and I think to some extent, some movies are designed to be just that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
It is a self contained experience.
I mostly agree and I'm fine with discussing any movie on these terms. But you seem to have come away with it being a think piece about technology vs. society, where I think it was much more immediate. Tone down Jonze's imagination and substitute a regular online relationship and the movie becomes far less abstract but no less personal.

As much as I hate to say it, I actually think Phoenix was a slight weak spot. He needed to be less removed imo.
01-22-2014 , 02:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
Both of you should start a Letterboxed account. great for film lists/blogs
This is awesome, had no idea there was something like this. tyty
01-22-2014 , 03:59 AM
The Raid 2 just killed Sundance. If only I were rich, or wrote for a bigger website. =(
01-22-2014 , 04:26 AM
Fruitvale Station is a tribute to the life of a young man tragically slain by the hand of a police officer. This is a movie that certainly needs to exist, it's a powerful rebuke to those who inevitably say "well he shouldn't have..." you know? I'm still a bit shook by it. It's one hell of a debut. 9/10
01-22-2014 , 04:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCroShow
The Raid 2 just killed Sundance. If only I were rich, or wrote for a bigger website. =(
Oh man I didn't know they were making another one.

01-22-2014 , 04:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
Fruitvale Station is a tribute to the life of a young man tragically slain by the hand of a police officer. This is a movie that certainly needs to exist, it's a powerful rebuke to those who inevitably say "well he shouldn't have..." you know? I'm still a bit shook by it. It's one hell of a debut. 9/10
I watched this last week also thought it was good.
01-22-2014 , 05:04 AM
inside llewyn davis was awesome.
Oscar Isaac was brilliant and the coen bros are a national treasure.
01-22-2014 , 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
Fruitvale Station is a tribute to the life of a young man tragically slain by the hand of a police officer. This is a movie that certainly needs to exist, it's a powerful rebuke to those who inevitably say "well he shouldn't have..." you know? I'm still a bit shook by it. It's one hell of a debut. 9/10
Watched it last weekend, well said, my recents:

Fruitvale Station (8.5/10)

Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters (6.7/10) - Fun movie, enjoyed it just as much as the 1st one, weird seeing the girl from True Detective with a perfect 10 body playing an innocent 18-19 year-old.

Kick Ass 2 (5.7/10) - Not the worst sequel I've seen, worth watching if you liked the 1st, but definitely not nearly as good, and I don't remember lol-ing more than a couple times.

The Butler (8.8/10) - Loved it, will never watch it again because I get overemotional from movies, but thought it was great.
01-22-2014 , 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubnjoy000
Lucky Number Slevin

It worked for me. The intensity of the crime thriller was tamed by a great a great sense of humor. As far as the soundtrack, it was engaging, at times classical/serious, other times, light, smoothing... But then it started to take itself too seriously. Regardless, I enjoyed it, but it was set too be on its way to a top tier film...

7.6/10
I think this is one of the most underrated/unknown movies ever. Such an enjoyable film. All the deadpan one liners just killed me

Spoiler:
Yeah, well you look like the guy who lives here.

Then you don't know what the guy who lives here looks like.


Spoiler:
I'm short for my height!


Spoiler:
Kid you should play ball.

Really? You think I'm tall enough?


Spoiler:
Charlie Chaplin once entered a Charlie Chaplin look-alike contest in Monte Carlo and came in third; that's a story.


Spoiler:
I'm gonna say the same thing any man with two penises says when his tailor asks him if he dresses to the right or left.

What?

Yes.
01-22-2014 , 03:40 PM
I enjoyed its style and it's humour, but the plot was just an absolute trainwreck and it relied on being unpredictably clever when it was anything but.
01-22-2014 , 05:12 PM
I liked Lucky Number Slevin a lot. It may suffer a bit from taking the plot a little too seriously and might have been better off leaving the viewer knowing that it was a complex plot, but maybe left in the dark over some details. I think it is generally a weakness when narration is needed to explain what's going on (the only exception coming to mind is Princess Bride - Scorcese is no exception there imo).

Still, the noir style of the filming and dialogue was well done. It wasn't exactly reality, but it wasn't so cartoonish that you couldn't really feel the relationship between Slevin and Lucy Lui (she's worth the price of admission here).

      
m