Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooksx
The depiction of drone warfare in movies is hardly original.
But it's not a generic depiction of drone warfare; it's a tongue-in-cheek takeoff of an actual 1980s arcade video game. If you aren't old enough to have played the game or remember it, then the entire joke just went over your head. But that's okay, there are a lot of Easter eggs in the movie that are meant for just a small section of the audience. Those of us who remember the game think that the use of it in the movie was fantastic; those who don't, just think that it was an unoriginal depiction of drone warfare.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooksx
The more important point is that the scenes were so boring and lacking in excitement.
Incidentally I love video games, but watching someone play one isn't terribly interesting unless you're looking for tips on beating a boss.
Look, I didn't think it was a great movie by any means (I believe I gave it a 6 out of 10), and everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so I won't try to change yours. But people should know that when you rate it as "absolutely awful," over 99% of the people who have seen it and rated it disagree with you. Of the 132,287 IMDB users who have given it a rating, only 1212 have rated it as low as a 1 or a 2 on a 10-point scale. (945 & 267, respectively) In fact, only another 1280 (again <1%) have it rated as a 3 or 4. So roughly 98% of 132K people have rated it a 5 or better. This in no way invalidates your opinion that it was truly awful, but it does put it in perspective for anyone considering how much to value your opinion when deciding whether to see the movie.