Dear friends,
It appears I need to make a few clarifications (that I believe you all know what I meant).
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
inhumane is not the word you are looking for here. unjust maybe. but O,,, you better start adjusting your line in the sand. Saying that two persons living together should not marry is preachy. I am perfectly happy with my son living unwed with his girlfriend.
perhaps you need to hire a proofreader.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
I've been with my gf for 17 years and not married. Are you trying to force marriage us?
Ober. I am disappoint.
Perhaps I should have reworded this thought to be:
Quote:
I believe it's unjust if you believe two people who love each other should not marry, assuming they want to get married
I believe you all know what I meant.
Quote:
Soft porn still exists? But I have to ask.....how do you know their purpose?
It's pretty obvious the purpose of soft-core porn is to not show genitalia. And while I applaud the industry's commitment to not showing genitalia for any sex, It's really a raw deal for people who are attracted to cis-males. Think about it. A Cis-male (I will refer to this person as a male to keep it shorter) has nipples and a penis. When this male is out in public, the male is free to wear no shirt exposing his nipples. This is something a cis-female cannot do. The male can show nipples in soft-core porn, but cannot display the penis, just like the male can do while out in public. I will grant you that the male cannot show his butt in public and can show it in soft-core porn. But again, the cis-female is in the same position.
This is why soft-core porn is meant to not be sexist... but it kinda still is...