ITT we troll physics - Page 5 - BBV4Life -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums 2+2 Communities BBV4Life

ITT we troll physics

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 5 of 24

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15

Last

Page 5 of 24

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15

Last

10-17-2010 , 05:27 PM

#101

Wamy Einehouse

rack 'em

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,653

Quote

10-17-2010 , 05:27 PM

#102

chardonis

grinder

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 631

Quote

10-17-2010 , 05:33 PM

#103

mused01

banned

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,215

[QUOTE=Wamy Einehouse;22241528]

This wouldn't work cuz the second guy in the 6th panel would be dead

Quote

10-17-2010 , 05:36 PM

#104

Tapow Dayok

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 4,121

Quote:

Originally Posted by esevans

Quote:

Originally Posted by ncboiler

Solid. Submit patent. Make millions

Quote:

Originally Posted by Romeo83

This would work.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chardonis

genius

Spoiler:

Quote

10-17-2010 , 06:50 PM

#105

Wamy Einehouse

rack 'em

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,653

Presenting a revolutionary breakthrough in nautical propulsion:

Quote

10-17-2010 , 08:10 PM

#106

robhimself

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 5,769

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tapow Dayok

Quote

10-17-2010 , 08:32 PM

#107

chardy

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 369

Quote:

Originally Posted by Romeo83

My 0 physics tells me the airplane needs forward movement for wings to generate upward lift, which is why the plane won't rise into the air while on the treadmill.

However, if you get the plane driving really fast and then suddenly stop the treadmill or make it instantly move the same direction as the airplane. What will happen ?

I do not know.

Spoiler:

Quote

10-17-2010 , 08:41 PM

#108

chardonis

grinder

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 631

Last edited by Kevroc; 10-18-2010 at 04:53 AM. Reason: hotlinked

Quote

10-17-2010 , 10:27 PM

#109

animal_chin

the friendly drunk

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 7,974

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawntificator

He's right, you know. Plus the stick would have way to much inertia to move easily. Even if the stick was made of an aerogel with a density of a mere 1.9 mg/cm^3, a stick 300,000,000 km long the width of a mere toothpick would have a mass of around 6000 kg, far too heavy for a human to move around with any convenience.

Dude the only practical material for the stick is carbon nanotubes.

Quote

10-17-2010 , 10:31 PM

#110

ncboiler

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 15,556

Quote:

Originally Posted by animal_chin

Dude the only practical material for the stick is carbon nanotubes.

Or my penis - if you fold it in half.

Quote

10-17-2010 , 10:33 PM

#111

mused01

banned

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,215

Quote:

Originally Posted by ncboiler

Or my penis - if you fold it in half.

how can you fold something infinitesmall?

Quote

10-17-2010 , 10:36 PM

#112

ncboiler

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 15,556

Quote:

Originally Posted by mused01

how can you fold something infinitesmall?

You need to study quantum mechanics my son.

Quote

10-18-2010 , 04:49 AM

#113

Romeo83

grinder

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 411

Quote:

Originally Posted by chardy

Spoiler:

yah, but would the plane have enough forward speed to get lift from the wings (when you turn off the treadmill)

Quote

10-18-2010 , 04:54 AM

#114

Kevroc

Chubby Chaser

Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 20,366

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wamy Einehouse

awesome

Quote

10-18-2010 , 06:49 AM

#115

Ricepaw1226

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 4,986

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wamy Einehouse

Quote

10-18-2010 , 09:55 AM

#116

physics

grinder

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 583

Quote:

Originally Posted by animal_chin

Dude the only practical material for the stick is carbon nanotubes.

I was reading some papers about carbon nanotubes. its abbreviated to CNT (as the symbol for Carbon is C, NT for nanotubles ldo)

I also read a paper on Copper Nanotubes where they used the same abbreviations. I imagine a lot of people were dissapointed by the content of these papers

Spoiler:

Quote

10-18-2010 , 10:00 AM

#117

JC_34

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 274

Quote:

Originally Posted by physics

Spoiler:

You sound like a bit of a copper nanotube

Quote

10-18-2010 , 10:01 AM

#118

physics

grinder

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 583

i have a copper nanotube, is that the same thing?

Quote

10-18-2010 , 10:17 AM

#119

JC_34

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 274

Quote:

Originally Posted by physics

i have a copper nanotube, is that the same thing?

Physics and a copper nanotube doesn't sound like a bad combination imo

Quote

10-18-2010 , 02:45 PM

#120

TiltNRun

grinder

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 696

pics of copper nanotube or gtfo

Quote

10-18-2010 , 03:36 PM

#121

Sp00n

adept

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,046

I call it the infinite uber fan. Please forgive the unforgivable artwork and useless position of the weirdface. However, do admire the laws of physics being broken before your very eyes.