Woah.

good news: i was probably right

bad news: i drew the agent smith card :| . Anyone seen Neo around?

“The photograph is in my hand. It is the photograph of a man and a woman. They are at an amusement park, in 1959. [...] I'm tired of looking at the photograph now. I open my fingers. It falls to the sand at my feet. I am going to look at the stars. They are so far away, and their light takes so long to reach us... All we ever see of stars are their old photographs. [...] It's October, 1985. I'm basking in the two-million-year-old light of Andromeda. I can see the supernova that Ernst Hartwig discovered in 1885, a century ago. It scintillates, a wink intended for the Trilobites, all long dead. Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place. All gold comes from supernovas.”
― Alan Moore, Watchmen

My father You could say is a watch maker after 34 years no I don't accept . . .

@Tuma

Taken From -"VeeDDzz`"

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/47...sness-1668441/

Quantum entanglement and consciousness
To open up discussion on free-will and how it could reside in the unknown, non-physical, realm where particles are entangled; i refer you to an upcoming study.

Lucien Hardy, a theoretical physicist from the Perimeter Institute in Canada, is suggesting that the measurements between A and B could be controlled by something that may potentially be separate from the material world: the human mind. His idea is derived from what French philosopher and mathematician Rene Descartes called the mind-matter duality, “[where] the mind is outside of regular physics and intervenes on the physical world,” as*Hardy explained.

To do this, Hardy proposed a version of the Bell test involving 100 humans, each hooked up to EEG headsets that would read their brain activity. These devices would be used to switch the settings on the measuring devices for A and B, set at 100 kilometers apart. “The radical possibility we wish to investigate is that, when humans are used to decide the settings (rather than various types of random number generators), we might then expect to see a violation of Quantum Theory in agreement with the relevant Bell inequality,” Hardy*wrote in a paper published online earlier this month.

If the correlation between the measurements don’t match previous Bell tests, then there could be a violation of quantum theory that suggests A and B are being controlled by factors outside the realm of standard physics. “[If] you only saw a violation of quantum theory when you had systems that might be regarded as conscious, humans or other animals, that would certainly be exciting. I can’t imagine a more striking experimental result in physics than that,” Hardy said. “We’d want to debate as to what that meant.”

Broke My arm in massive car crash been hard to think liner thank Me that's never been a problem . . .

Just out from hospital 100k bill I'm happy to be Ok . . .

"Good dream, let me guess, the surface of the sun? The only dream I ever have, every time I shut my eyes it's always the same..." . . .

I have arrived . . . — feeling amused

your tie is too short

As I've gotten older I seem to think more and more about the idea that We as a Human species may just not know anything @ all nothing, we think we know that there is gravity, we think that we know that we live on this planet earth, and that through experiments like the hadron collider were getting closer to understanding how our universe everything may work . . .

Why why do we think that, I have asked Myself that question more and more,I think we honestly may just not know anything anything at all, that the creators of this video game we call life may or may not have inserted code that makes it so You can only get so far, and yet it's only the human mind that we know of, in the Entire Universe that can think of questions like this . . -D1G1TALFOX 🤔✍️😎