Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bass
Okay now I have questions! I already congratulated you earlier itt so moving on:
1) Say a person has a job he likes at least a little bit and that takes reasonable education like a lawyer, doctor etc. However he's also very good at MTTs. How many times x his income in this job would he have to (be expected to) make at MTTs per year so that you'd think it's a good idea to start playing MTTs full time? Do you think that people these days are giving education or their jobs up too easily to play poker not thinking about the downsides (poker's future being uncertain, you don't get sick leave / paid holidays / insurance / pension etc)?
For some reason this question made me think of:
Given the parameters of your question, I don't see how ANY income multiplier would make it a prudent choice to switch over from being a doctor/lawyer and play MTTs full time. The only reason I could see it being a worthy decision is if you hate your real-world profession and love poker, but even then...I think poker is a great full-time profession for people who aren't engaged elsewhere professionally and a great hobby for those who are.
Quote:
2. Have you ever done, or seriously considered doing drugs that might help with short-term results in poker such as Adderall or bananas etc?
Meh, when Paul Phillips was talking about his success with Provigil, I think I tried it once or twice, but ultimately I don't want to be dependent on prescription drugs in order to feel like I'm playing my best. I've discussed "bananas" elsewhere, and I don't think they help with results, more like a behavioral leak, but I think it helps dull some of the emotional swings.
Quote:
3) Thoughts on how deep of a bankroll makes for optimal performance in MTTs? I mean, almost any of us apart from the sickest HSMTTers would be at least a little bit scared money in a WSOP ME final table, or when FT'ing an online MTT that's way above our buy-in range. On the flip side of the coin, when you have too many buy-ins for a certain level I think it's easy to start spewing and FPS'ing too much unless you're very disciplined. I'm struggling with this myself at the moment. I was doing very very well at an ABI of ~$50 over a large sample, then won a big live event and all of a sudden I have so many buy-ins for the level that it makes me too careless and I make crazy 6 bet bluff spews all the time. But I'd still like to grind it up the right way, making sure I don't go up in limits too fast missing things I need to learn on the way. All of my attempts at 1ks, 500s and 109rs have failed miserably yet I still struggle to get back in good grinding mood at the stakes that I used to play pre-winning 6 figures.
I can't say I have any thoughts on this. I definitely don't want to present myself as a bankroll expert, and your question is even more complex. You seem to be aware of whatever psychology is at work, and that really seems like 1/2 the battle. Just remember that big score you got doesn't really mean much in the long run unless you can sustain a grind.
Quote:
4) What's the crappiest thing a poker player has done to you? Like a scam, an angleshoot, a loan not paid back, some kind of bashing behind your back, etc.
Actually, really can't think of anything too bad...Friend once "stole" $200 from my safe at the Bellagio, was a drag but didn't ruin the friendship.
Quote:
5) Can you share a hand history that ranks high in your lifetime most expensive ($-wise) spews? Doesn't have to be exact, just as you remember it. I think you mentioned earlier itt that you spewed pretty hard at some WPT final table or something like that...?
Yeah, there was an ace-rag resteal vs Kevin Saul at Bellagio Cup 2007 that cost me dearly, and I don't like to think about it!
Quote:
6) Do you think that the differences in structures of tournaments can favour certain types of players? I don't mean this in an obvious level like turbos as opposed to deepstacks, but tournaments that have fairly similar yet slightly different structures. Where I'm coming from is that iirc there are certain tourneys where you've done very well like the 109r (?). I play on a regular schedule, and there are some tournaments where I get top scores on a regular basis and some tournaments where I never get any results at all. Yet the difference in their structures seems to be pretty small, the player pools are similar, and I just can't figure out what's going on.
I think it's just lolvariance. Certainly different structures will favor different playing styles, but any MTT player who adjusts well should be able to beat various structures with similar frequency, but I've indicated elsewhere that there are certain intangible things (focus, hunger) that subtly contribute to success in one format vs. another.
Quote:
7) Do you think that people from certain ethnic backgrounds are more likely to do well in poker than others? Do you believe in nationality stereotypes? Like when a random shoves on you on the river in a weird spot and you're like wtf and you're 50-50 on call/fold, do you check his location and go "ahh spanish, I call!".
I check the location and then call regardless of where they're from.
I don't think poker favors any ethnicity, although a NYC player once said that cultures who have struggled throughout history are all drawn to the game...but really every ethnicity has experienced some period of major struggle in its history, and they're not all drawn to poker, so, nah.
Quote:
8) Are there any mistakes that reasonably good MTTers do regularly during the rebuy period? What are they?
People play the rebuy periods pretty straightforward these days as far as I can tell. We're probably all a little more splashy during the rebuy period, but it's hard to consider that a huge mistake, and there aren't many players who go nuts regularly anymore.
YW! TY!