Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars MTT Thread PokerStars MTT Thread

04-22-2017 , 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by norfair18
Run a midstakes series? Bring back bigger/hotter labels for sunday? Run a pokerstars festival week? Weekend WCOOP series? Double vision promo? There's a dearth of promos for vanilla freezeouts outside of the COOPs...it's no surprise participation and excitement are decreasing. These are promos stars used to run regularly in the past, and shouldn't be hard to re-implement. Biggest obstacle to growing bigs/hots again seems to be pokerstars unwillingness to do so.


this and DBerlins post if implemented you could close this thread and never have to say another word were just not being listened to as buffy said absolute pointless, pissing into the wind even suggesting anythin for last 5 months

run it twice horrid idea imho also or if it is implemented have it like cash were players have option not to do so if they so chose to not RIT
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-22-2017 , 10:53 AM
pay jumps at 13 17 26 44 71 makes no sense and there's not a single other poker site that has these awful structures , i don't see how shlomo azkenazi makes more money off this so pls change it back ?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-22-2017 , 08:06 PM
Are there any plans to add a lower buy-in variant to the On Demands? The $15s run very often but most players cannot afford them

Seeing how there are officially no 45mans above $7 which themselves rarely run what about merging the 45mans and 18mans into something like 27Mans? Firstly this would dramatically improve game liquidity. Secondly these tournament can have breaks every hour rather than the ridiculous"every even hour" for 18Mans. Thirdly these games would be less ICM intensive with 5/27 rather than 4/18 paid, which i would think recreational players would prefer.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-22-2017 , 08:15 PM
320$ and 109$ early overlayd again.

Yeah, it inst working guys, bring back the SKO pls.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-23-2017 , 11:06 PM
if only they put as much effort into the consistant and repeated suggestions in here as they are into the 320 total overlay weekly the sched would be revitalised
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-25-2017 , 03:46 AM
Guys stars don't care what you want. They care about profit that us all. Close thread already
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-25-2017 , 02:54 PM
run it twice in MTT's really awful idea
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-25-2017 , 03:03 PM
#BringBackFullTilt
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-25-2017 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePokerBot
Are there any plans to add a lower buy-in variant to the On Demands? The $15s run very often but most players cannot afford them

Seeing how there are officially no 45mans above $7 which themselves rarely run what about merging the 45mans and 18mans into something like 27Mans? Firstly this would dramatically improve game liquidity. Secondly these tournament can have breaks every hour rather than the ridiculous"every even hour" for 18Mans. Thirdly these games would be less ICM intensive with 5/27 rather than 4/18 paid, which i would think recreational players would prefer.
This, please.

At least make the $8 180M on demand. They barely run, and if they run it's at the daily peak hour(s)
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooportunity
This, please.

At least make the $8 180M on demand. They barely run, and if they run it's at the daily peak hour(s)

Curious on this. Why would you guys like on demands?


Also to someone else that posted


Are there any plans to add a lower buy-in variant to the On Demands? The $15s run very often but most players cannot afford them



So most low stakes pokerstars players can't afford to play $15 tournamnets with under 90 players etc? Also back then there were a decent amount of $15 and $8 180 mans that went. Why are there very few players playing them?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 03:56 AM
bring back Daily $1+R 3xTurbo 60k gtd
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 06:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulyJames200x
So most low stakes pokerstars players can't afford to play $15 tournamnets with under 90 players etc? Also back then there were a decent amount of $15 and $8 180 mans that went. Why are there very few players playing them?
The decline is so strong, I'm gonna guess it's the nearly 10% rake, hyper turbo structure and people getting too good for that combo to survive.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 06:30 AM
I remember the days when I could easily have 20x $12 180mans going at the same time. Back when they had the Daily 90 Grand $55 FO. Those were the days man. Those were the **** days.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 06:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulyJames200x
Curious on this. Why would you guys like on demands?


Also to someone else that posted


Are there any plans to add a lower buy-in variant to the On Demands? The $15s run very often but most players cannot afford them



So most low stakes pokerstars players can't afford to play $15 tournamnets with under 90 players etc? Also back then there were a decent amount of $15 and $8 180 mans that went. Why are there very few players playing them?

Would like them on demand because they run faster. They don't run fast enough to multitable them effective. I think lots of grinders can relate. That's the reason they made the $15 ones on demand, they simply died being 180's.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Unit
I remember the days when I could easily have 20x $12 180mans going at the same time. Back when they had the Daily 90 Grand $55 FO. Those were the days man. Those were the **** days.
Site sucks now. No one gives a rats ass about anyone. They just print money and go on vacations.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soepgroente
The decline is so strong, I'm gonna guess it's the nearly 10% rake, hyper turbo structure and people getting too good for that combo to survive.

no offense, but is there a way I can block your image? or as a general question to Mod of this forum.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by probability1
no offense, but is there a way I can block your image? or as a general question to Mod of this forum.
there's a browser extension that rhymes with Mad Clock Blus that can help with this
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 09:11 PM
Can you please add more ($0.55 - $5.50) zoom tournaments to your schedule. I think they’re basically a better version of your bubble rush tournaments, because the bubble is usually reached around the same time, (occasionally 5 – 8 minutes earlier) and the variance is lower. I would also like it if you combined some of the bubble rush features with zoom. (e.g. changing the time structure from 5 minutes to 10 minutes when the zoom play ends at 27 players)

Another thing that I’ve been wanting to see for years is a tournament option similar to the matrix Sit&Gos that used to be on Full Tilt. (4 tournaments with the same buy-in starting at the same time) It would give people the option of playing a higher volume of tournaments that they like, regardless of what time of day it is. You could set it up in a way that would give players the option of choosing 1 to 4 buy-ins on most of your regular tournaments.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-26-2017 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2XRP934
Can you please add more ($0.55 - $5.50) zoom tournaments to your schedule. I think they’re basically a better version of your bubble rush tournaments, because the bubble is usually reached around the same time, (occasionally 5 – 8 minutes earlier) and the variance is lower. I would also like it if you combined some of the bubble rush features with zoom. (e.g. changing the time structure from 5 minutes to 10 minutes when the zoom play ends at 27 players)

Another thing that I’ve been wanting to see for years is a tournament option similar to the matrix Sit&Gos that used to be on Full Tilt. (4 tournaments with the same buy-in starting at the same time) It would give people the option of playing a higher volume of tournaments that they like, regardless of what time of day it is. You could set it up in a way that would give players the option of choosing 1 to 4 buy-ins on most of your regular tournaments.
Like the ideas but they won't change their schedule. They intentionally make it worse each day. Never take any feedback. Luke and other staff are on vacation til Christmas
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2017 , 08:52 AM
Quote:
Biggest obstacle to growing bigs/hots again seems to be pokerstars unwillingness to do so.
So true
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2017 , 08:51 PM
its very weird

any guesses as to why (outside of wanting bounty builders to grow)
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2017 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protential
its very weird

any guesses as to why (outside of wanting bounty builders to grow)


recs still can win money even without cashing, bust with a booty in there account and recycle some of it into other games at a total guess they totaly killed rebuys and bigs very intently by the looks
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2017 , 11:54 PM
lower edge for regs in progs (fish never folding is actually a viable strategy) fish bleed money slower+less money gets siphoned out by regs ie playing field leveling

only assuming though would need to scope a big sample of regs in progs. to verify
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-28-2017 , 07:29 AM
in b4 PSKOOP
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-28-2017 , 07:33 AM
PSKCOOP*
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote

      
m