Or, he probably is terrible
I mean he's not terrible terrible, but he's got an insane amount of run good (from what I have seen so far.) Makes ridiculous -EV plays (which if you run an intense metagame might end up being +EV in the future --
maybe.)
I would say he's about 25% to be a poker genious and 75% to be at the high end of the gauss curve of variance (as in there's always going to be people that simply run way to good for us to realize that they're bad just by looking at their end-results over a small sample.)