Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
****Official PartyPoker/Bwin 2015 MTT Discussion Thread**** ****Official PartyPoker/Bwin 2015 MTT Discussion Thread****

10-04-2015 , 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coinflipper
something like 12/14 $109 events have worse structures then their daily/weekly counterparts. the majority of the pfest 109's are 5k chips 10min blinds. the daily 109 is 10k chips 12min, the morning and nightly are 3k chips and 15min. the saturday is 5k or 3k dont remember, 15 min blinds. the sunday 40k is 5k/12min. just doesnt make sense the structures so bad on the pokerfest ones.
I would like to mention, that longer blind structures don't mean better tournament structures. 10 mins blinds are fine, but Party (and most of other sites) should remove some early blind levels and add some late blind levels to late stages of tournaments. I don't play those stupid 15 mins or 20 mins blind level tournaments: their structure is plainly horrible (maybe ok for 200$+ Sunday Major to have 15 mins levels and at very late stage 20 min).

Best tournaments I think are actually tournaments which have either 6 or 8 mins blinds, are around 8-max and have lots of levels in late stage of tournament and less in beginning. Like 15/30 -> 25/50 -> 50/100 -> 75/150 but like 1000/2000 -> 1200/2400 -> 1500/3000 and 10k /20k -> 12k / 24k -> 14k/28k -> 17k / 34k -> 20k / 40k.
10-04-2015 , 11:19 AM
I guess the Sharkscope, PocketFives and all kind of tracking sites are still going to work right ?
10-04-2015 , 11:37 AM
I asked the same question. Never got a response.
10-04-2015 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coinflipper
last i checked new pokerfest schedule has been up for a few days now.

WRT Pokerfest:

something like 12/14 $109 events have worse structures then their daily/weekly counterparts. the majority of the pfest 109's are 5k chips 10min blinds. the daily 109 is 10k chips 12min, the morning and nightly are 3k chips and 15min. the saturday is 5k or 3k dont remember, 15 min blinds. the sunday 40k is 5k/12min. just doesnt make sense the structures so bad on the pokerfest ones.
Yeah, I see it in the tournament section on party now.

@Colette, something good to add for the VIP store for PokerFest would be a package for all THREE sundays for 40% rakeback (a different option than the one that is for all 80 events[40%rakeback]). It's easy to commit to play all three sundays, but really difficult to commit to every single event over the course of the 15 days.
10-04-2015 , 02:07 PM
Hi all

We have emergency downtime planned on Monday Oct 5th at 8am (CEST) - this will take approx 2 hours and we aim to fully resolve some issues which have recently caused us technical problems.

This will mean you will see a reduced schedule this evening as a direct result of the planned maintenance

Also - for our planned $100K High Roller event at 15:00 ET we will have reduced blinds - blinds will be 15mins not 20 mins for this evenings tournament.

Kind regards,

Colette

Last edited by pokerColette; 10-04-2015 at 02:15 PM.
10-04-2015 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lessu
Currently it can still be done with a simple 3rd party program.
It's old. I just tested it. It still works.
10-04-2015 , 10:48 PM
Making a better software would be awesome. Partypoker has the worst most tilting software of all time and its not even close.
10-04-2015 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pootietang
Making a better software would be awesome. Partypoker has the worst most tilting software of all time and its not even close.
no, I don`t agree.
Party software is ok and there`re quite few rooms with much worse software.
10-05-2015 , 03:40 AM
thoughts on this hand guys? seems a little weird that a human being who is playing 22/11/2 would bet 1/2 pot into a dry side-pot on turn. perhaps a bot?

    Party, $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #37146195

    MP: $155.39 (155.4 bb)
    BTN: $10.07 (10.1 bb)
    Hero (CO): $231.11 (231.1 bb)
    SB: $191.45 (191.5 bb)
    BB: $133.11 (133.1 bb)
    UTG: $129.16 (129.2 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is CO with Q K
    2 folds, Hero raises to $3, BTN raises to $10.07 and is all-in, SB calls $9.57, BB folds, Hero calls $7.07

    Flop: ($31.21) 3 7 8 (3 players, 1 is all-in)
    SB checks, Hero checks

    Turn: ($31.21) 3 (3 players, 1 is all-in)
    SB bets $14.82, Hero folds

    River: ($31.21) 6 (2 players, 1 is all-in)

    Spoiler:
    Results: $31.21 pot ($1.56 rake)
    Final Board: 3 7 8 3 6
    BTN mucked A T and lost (-$10.07 net)
    Hero mucked Q K and lost (-$10.07 net)
    SB showed 9 T and won $29.65 ($19.58 net)



    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.
    10-05-2015 , 04:02 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by isplashcranberrys
    thoughts on this hand guys? seems a little weird that a human being who is playing 22/11/2 would bet 1/2 pot into a dry side-pot on turn. perhaps a bot?

      Party, $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #37146195

      MP: $155.39 (155.4 bb)
      BTN: $10.07 (10.1 bb)
      Hero (CO): $231.11 (231.1 bb)
      SB: $191.45 (191.5 bb)
      BB: $133.11 (133.1 bb)
      UTG: $129.16 (129.2 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is CO with Q K
      2 folds, Hero raises to $3, BTN raises to $10.07 and is all-in, SB calls $9.57, BB folds, Hero calls $7.07

      Flop: ($31.21) 3 7 8 (3 players, 1 is all-in)
      SB checks, Hero checks

      Turn: ($31.21) 3 (3 players, 1 is all-in)
      SB bets $14.82, Hero folds

      River: ($31.21) 6 (2 players, 1 is all-in)

      Spoiler:
      Results: $31.21 pot ($1.56 rake)
      Final Board: 3 7 8 3 6
      BTN mucked A T and lost (-$10.07 net)
      Hero mucked Q K and lost (-$10.07 net)
      SB showed 9 T and won $29.65 ($19.58 net)



      Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.
      .

      Last edited by coinflipper; 10-05-2015 at 04:03 AM. Reason: realized cash hand in mttc
      10-05-2015 , 05:20 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by user12345
      no, I don`t agree.
      Party software is ok and there`re quite few rooms with much worse software.
      ipoker with their 999999999 annoying pop ups yeah
      10-05-2015 , 05:50 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by coinflipper
      .
      I went through 100s of hands and this guy doesn't have an agressive bone in his body. He's checking back trips and straights on the river and betting in seemingly random/weird spots. It could just be me, I am 30K hands into this month already.
      10-05-2015 , 12:57 PM
      Can you please start the 50r 15k @ :00 , it has no break after 15 minutes, which is pretty annoying.
      10-05-2015 , 07:50 PM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by user12345
      no, I don`t agree.
      Party software is ok and there`re quite few rooms with much worse software.
      haha ok so where do you play? stars, FTP, 888, carbon, winamax all have way better software. If you think party has ok software you are pretty much alone on that one i believe. Just because there are a few rooms with worse software does not mean that party should not improve.
      10-06-2015 , 05:03 AM
      They fixed their bugs so its really acceptable atm for me (except 3% vig ), Im very used to it as well.
      FTP has much more annoying default layout imo.

      You can post what you dont like actually.
      10-07-2015 , 08:33 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by schmette
      Can you please start the 50r 15k @ :00 , it has no break after 15 minutes, which is pretty annoying.
      Hi

      Will look into this - however we are currently planning a new schedule starting post pokerfest - so it may be we let it run as it is till we overhaul the current offerings

      Thanks

      Colette
      10-07-2015 , 08:39 AM
      hey colette,

      when you are looking into a new schedule, could you please consider adding a cool 6max daily tournament? something like a 33 or 55fo 6max or rebuy would do very good imho. slap a decent gtd on it, and watch it grow
      10-07-2015 , 12:19 PM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by LittleGoliath
      hey colette,

      when you are looking into a new schedule, could you please consider adding a cool 6max daily tournament? something like a 33 or 55fo 6max or rebuy would do very good imho. slap a decent gtd on it, and watch it grow
      +1

      please add some nice 6max tourneys, 55$ or 109$ would be cool
      10-07-2015 , 06:41 PM
      how about u post (atleast parts of) it here before so we can give you feedback?
      10-08-2015 , 06:54 AM
      Please make a sunday $215 sat to wpt montreal
      10-08-2015 , 11:28 PM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by rodgethat
      Please make a sunday $215 sat to wpt montreal
      +1 seat only.
      10-09-2015 , 12:41 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Sect7G
      +1
      seat only.
      +2.
      10-09-2015 , 10:15 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by LittleGoliath
      hey colette,

      when you are looking into a new schedule, could you please consider adding a cool 6max daily tournament? something like a 33 or 55fo 6max or rebuy would do very good imho. slap a decent gtd on it, and watch it grow
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Kranke_EinZ
      +1

      please add some nice 6max tourneys, 55$ or 109$ would be cool
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by rodgethat
      Please make a sunday $215 sat to wpt montreal
      Feedback noted and shared with our PR management

      Thanks

      Colette
      10-09-2015 , 11:07 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by mo3rtelmu
      how about u post (atleast parts of) it here before so we can give you feedback?
      ###
      10-10-2015 , 12:03 AM
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Party_Rep
      we overhaul the current offerings

      Thanks

      Colette
      things seem to be doing ok. not sure why you dont focus on constant small modifications to the schedule based on performance/feedback. an overhaul sounds like a less then 5% chance its going to be a good thing for the players.

      i wouldnt mind if you proved me wrong though.

            
      m